AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon 530

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano643% better
17,28217% of 104,737
Radeon 530
2,3272% of 104,737

The Radeon R9 Nano has 643% better performance than the Radeon 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
Radeon 530
No data available

The Radeon R9 Nano has 16% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop Radeon R9 Nano
Shop Radeon 530
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The R9 Nano has the 133rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.50% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 82nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the AMD Radeon 530 GPU

The AMD Radeon 530 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Weston) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 530 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 530 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 730 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 891 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 530 has the 341st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 3.0GCN 3.0
Market SegmentDesktopMobile
Release DateQ3 2015Q2 2017
Launch Price (MSRP)$649--
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Radeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
Low - 720p
--
46 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
17 FPS
High - 1080p
--
11 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orRadeon 530
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX15017.8+65%
Radeon 540X16.9+56%
GeForce MX13012+11%
GeForce 930MX11.6+7%
GeForce MX11011.1+3%
Radeon 53010.8

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orRadeon 530
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano643% better
17,28217% of 104,737
Radeon 530
2,3272% of 104,737

The Radeon R9 Nano has 643% better performance than the Radeon 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 133rd with a score of 17,282, and the Radeon 530 is ranked 341st with a score of 2,327.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
Radeon 530
No data available

The Radeon R9 Nano has 41% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Radeon R9 Nano's 26.63 performance per dollar ranks it 82nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 FURY17,543+2%
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)17,401+1%
Radeon R9 Nano17,282
Radeon R9 290X16,167.5-6%
GeForce GTX 97016,033-7%
Radeon HD 8850M2,349-86%
GeForce 840M2,340-86%
Radeon 5302,327-87%
FirePro W4170M2,315-87%
GeForce GT 745M2,249-87%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orRadeon 530
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 980 Ti35.53+33%
GeForce GTX 98032.07+20%
Radeon R9 FURY31.95+20%
Radeon R9 290X29.45+11%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti28.14+6%
Radeon R9 Nano26.63
GeForce GTX 780 Ti22.34-16%
GeForce GTX 68020.47-23%
GeForce GTX 59013.11-51%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,511
(+918.28%)
443
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,556
(+816.7%)
497
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
81,374
(+783.54%)
9,210
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
14,362
(+831.39%)
1,542
3DMark 11 Performance Score
14,793
(+489.83%)
2,508
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
44.5
PassMark G3D Mark
--
1,020
PassMark G2D Mark
--
176
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
17
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
14.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
CodenameFijiWeston
ArchitectureGCN 3.0GCN 3.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors8,900 million1,550 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeHBMGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth512 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock500 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface4,096 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
Slots2 slots--
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)175 W50 W
Suggested PSU450 W--
Power Connectors1x 8-pin--
OutputsHDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2Device Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
Stream Processors (SP)4,096384
Compute Units (CU)646
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)25624
Render Output Units (ROP)648
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz730 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--891 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
Pixel Fill Rate64 GPixel/s7.13 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate256 GTexel/s21.38 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.19 TFLOPS684.3 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance512 GFLOPS42.77 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon 530
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.