Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,598
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q102% better
17,52317% of 104,598
The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has 102% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) and the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Shop Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU106) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 3000 Max-Q has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 3000 Max-Q includes 1,920 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 600 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,215 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 120 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 240 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 30 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 3000 Max-Q has the 129th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2015 | Q2 2019 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Hitman 3
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
DIRT 5
Watch Dogs: Legion
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Hitman 3 | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 178 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 100 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 86 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 78 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 27 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 34.2 | +27% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 33.4 | +24% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 31.2 | +16% |
| Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | 27 | |
| Radeon RX 5500M | 22.6 | -16% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | 21.4 | -21% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 21.1 | -22% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 19.3 | -29% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,598
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q102% better
17,52317% of 104,598
The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has 102% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656, and the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is ranked 129th with a score of 17,523.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) and the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 18,057 | +109% |
| Radeon RX 6500M | 17,889 | +107% |
| Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | 17,523 | +102% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 17,439 | +101% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) | 17,421 | +101% |
| Radeon R9 M295X | 8,850.5 | +2% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | 8,752 | +1% |
| Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | 8,656 | |
| GeForce GTX 880M | 8,578 | -1% |
| Radeon RX 560 Mobile | 8,329 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 5,048 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 5,357 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 38,490 | 66,284 (+72.21%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 6,819 | 13,617 (+99.69%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 8,305 | 16,577 (+99.6%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 202 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,911 | 8,255 (+68.09%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 719 (+112.72%) | 338 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Amethyst | TU106 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 5,000 million | 10,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 174.7 Gb/s | 288 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,365 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 3 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 60 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 1,792 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 1,920 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 28 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 30 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 112 | 120 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 240 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 30 |
| Core Clock Speed | 834 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,215 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 26.69 GPixel/s | 77.76 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 93.41 GTexel/s | 145.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.99 TFLOPS | 4.67 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 373.6 GFLOPS | 145.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
AMD Radeon RX 5500MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
vs
AMD Radeon RX 560 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
AMD Radeon RX 5500MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
vs
AMD Radeon RX 560 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.