AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,598
Radeon RX 7600M306% better
35,10134% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 7600M has 306% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon RX 7600M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) and the Radeon RX 7600M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Shop Radeon RX 7600M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon RX 7600M GPU

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 33) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX 7600M includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,410 MHz. It usually operates at 2,070 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 28 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 90 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX 7600M has the 58th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 33.56% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 3.0RDNA 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q1 2023
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Last Epoch
Last Epoch
Display FPS for Skull & Bones
Skull & Bones
Display FPS for Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2
Display FPS for Enshrouded
Enshrouded

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
Low - 1080p
--
--
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
50 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
35 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
20 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon RX 7600M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon RX 7600M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,598
Radeon RX 7600M306% better
35,10134% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 7600M has 306% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656, and the Radeon RX 7600M is ranked 58th with a score of 35,101.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon RX 7600M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) and the Radeon RX 7600M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon RX 7600M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
9,097
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
9,172
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
38,490
126,084
(+227.58%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,819
25,679
(+276.58%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,305
28,427
(+242.29%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
173
PassMark G3D Mark
4,911
(+24.64%)
3,940
PassMark G2D Mark
719
(+50.73%)
477
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
CodenameAmethystNavi 33
ArchitectureGCN 3.0RDNA 3.0
Process Size28 nm6 nm
Transistors5,000 million13,300 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
Memory Size2 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth174.7 Gb/s256 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,365 MHz2,000 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache--2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)250 W90 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
Stream Processors (SP)1,7921,792
Compute Units (CU)2828
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)112112
Render Output Units (ROP)3264
Ray Accelerators--28
Core Clock Speed834 MHz1,500 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--2,410 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Game)--2,070 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
Pixel Fill Rate26.69 GPixel/s154.2 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate93.41 GTexel/s269.9 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.99 TFLOPS17.27 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance373.6 GFLOPS539.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon RX 7600M
DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.12.2
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.