AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)14% better
8,6568% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 560X
7,5907% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 14% better performance than the Radeon Pro 560X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon Pro 560X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) and the Radeon Pro 560X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Shop Radeon Pro 560X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro 560X GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q3 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 560X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,470 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 94.08 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 560X includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,004 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 560X has the 213th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 3.0GCN 4.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q3 2018
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
Low - 720p
--
90 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
46 FPS
High - 1080p
--
29 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
26 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
19 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon Pro 560X
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon RX 6800S150+706%
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile145+680%
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile128.5+591%
Radeon RX 6700S120.8+549%
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q96.6+419%
Radeon Pro 560X18.6

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon Pro 560X
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)14% better
8,6568% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 560X
7,5907% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 14% better performance than the Radeon Pro 560X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656, and the Radeon Pro 560X is ranked 213th with a score of 7,590.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon Pro 560X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) and the Radeon Pro 560X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon Pro 560X
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,614
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,775
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
38,490
(+18.62%)
32,449
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,819
(+19.65%)
5,699
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,305
(+4.99%)
7,910
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
98.4
PassMark G3D Mark
4,911
(+33.52%)
3,678
PassMark G2D Mark
719
722
(+0.42%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
CodenameAmethystPolaris 21
ArchitectureGCN 3.0GCN 4.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors5,000 million3,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth174.7 Gb/s94.08 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,365 MHz1,470 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache--1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)250 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
Stream Processors (SP)1,7921,024
Compute Units (CU)2816
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)11264
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed834 MHz1,004 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
Pixel Fill Rate26.69 GPixel/s16.06 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate93.41 GTexel/s64.26 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.99 TFLOPS2.06 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance373.6 GFLOPS128.5 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon Pro 560X
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.