PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) vs AMD Radeon 680M

AMD
VS
AMD
Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,937
Radeon 680M20% better
10,39910% of 104,937

The Radeon 680M has 20% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Shop Radeon 680M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2015. Its Amethyst chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,365 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This mobile card has a TDP of 250 W.

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has the 189th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.25% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU

The Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q1 2022. Its Rembrandt chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.

This mobile card has a TDP of 50 W.

The Radeon 680M has the 173rd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.91% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 3.0RDNA 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q1 2022
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24
More games to choose from
More Games

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Low - 1080p
--
34 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
25 FPS
High - 1080p
--
24 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
23 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon 680M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce RTX 2050 (Mobile)33+42%
Radeon 680M23.3
Radeon RX 560X (Mobile)20.2-13%
Radeon 660M14.8-36%
Arc A370M11.4-51%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon 680M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,937
Radeon 680M20% better
10,39910% of 104,937

The Radeon 680M has 20% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 189th with a score of 8,656, and the Radeon 680M is ranked 173rd with a score of 10,399.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) orRadeon 680M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
2,313
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
2,594.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
38,490
43,250
(+12.37%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,819
6,865
(+0.67%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,305
10,377
(+24.95%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
145
PassMark G3D Mark
4,949
--
PassMark G2D Mark
725
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
CodenameAmethystRembrandt
ArchitectureGCN 3.0RDNA 2.0
Process Size28 nm6 nm
Transistors5,000 million13,100 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Memory Size2 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeGDDR5System Shared
Memory Bandwidth174.7 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock1,365 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface256 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache--2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)250 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Stream Processors (SP)1,792768
Compute Units (CU)2812
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)11248
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Ray Tracing Cores--12
Core Clock Speed834 MHz2,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Pixel Fill Rate26.69 GPixel/s70.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate93.41 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.99 TFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance373.6 GFLOPS211.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.12.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.