AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M385X64% better
5,514.55% of 104,598
GeForce MX230
3,363.53% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M385X has 64% better performance than the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available
GeForce MX230
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M385X and the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M385X
Shop GeForce MX230
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M385X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M385X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Strato) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M385X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 76.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M385X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M385X has the 234th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX230 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2019. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX230 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX230 includes 256 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,519 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,531 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX230 has the 287th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Pascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q1 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Display FPS for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
Display FPS for Control
Control
Display FPS for F1 2019
F1 2019
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Radeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
Low - 720p
--
40 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
16 FPS
High - 1080p
--
10 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
7 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M385X orGeForce MX230
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe MAX11.7+58%
GeForce GTX 950M10.3+39%
GeForce MX25010.2+38%
GeForce MX3308.8+19%
GeForce MX1508.4+14%
GeForce MX2307.4
Radeon 610M6-19%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M385X orGeForce MX230
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M385X64% better
5,514.55% of 104,598
GeForce MX230
3,363.53% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M385X has 64% better performance than the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M385X is ranked 234th with a score of 5,514.5, and the GeForce MX230 is ranked 287th with a score of 3,363.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available
GeForce MX230
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M385X and the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M385X or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 7970M5,645+2%
Radeon HD 6970M X25,541.5+0%
Radeon R9 M385X5,514.5
Radeon Pro 4555,388-2%
FirePro M61005,369-3%
Quadro K4000M3,466-37%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369-39%
GeForce MX2303,363.5-39%
Radeon R9 M3753,314-40%
GeForce 945M3,309.5-40%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M385X orGeForce MX230
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
748
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
839.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
22,544
(+42.72%)
15,796.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,404.5
(+37.97%)
2,467.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
4,456.5
(+23.06%)
3,621.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
44.8
83.4
(+86.16%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,994
(+8.66%)
1,835
PassMark G2D Mark
267
(+25.35%)
213
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
CodenameStratoGP108
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Pascal
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors2,080 million1,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth76.8 Gb/s48.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,200 MHz1,502 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB48 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W10 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
Stream Processors (SP)896--
CUDA Cores--256
Compute Units (CU)14--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)5616
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz1,519 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,100 MHz1,531 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
Pixel Fill Rate17.6 GPixel/s24.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate61.6 GTexel/s24.5 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.97 TFLOPS783.9 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance123.2 GFLOPS24.5 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M385XGeForce MX230
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.