Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti315% better
22,891.522% of 104,737
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 315% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
82.0551% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 51% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon R9 M385X
Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R9 M385X GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 M385X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Strato) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 M385X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 76.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 M385X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The R9 M385X has the 234th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2019 with a MSRP of $279. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1660 Ti includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,770 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1660 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 300 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 120 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1660 Ti has the 103rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 21.86% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 22,891.5 score and $279 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 82.05. This is the 35th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2015 | Q1 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $279 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Riders Republic
Far Cry 6
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Vampire Bloodhunt
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Ghostwire: Tokyo
ELEX 2
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Riders Republic | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 174 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 94 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 75 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 66 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 45 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 20 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M385X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5700 | 34 | +70% |
| Radeon RX 5600 XT | 31 | +55% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 29 | +45% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 23 | +15% |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 22 | +10% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 20 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 20 | +0% |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 9 | -55% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M385X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5700 | 10.26 | -26% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 10.95 | -22% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 11.08 | -21% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 11.34 | -19% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 12.48 | -11% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 13.95 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 22.11 | +59% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti315% better
22,891.522% of 104,737
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 315% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 M385X is ranked 234th with a score of 5,514.5, and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is ranked 103rd with a score of 22,891.5.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
82.0551% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 125% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 82.05 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M385X or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 23,057 | +318% |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 22,954 | +316% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 22,891.5 | +315% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 21,980.5 | +299% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 21,063.5 | +282% |
| Radeon HD 7970M | 5,645 | +2% |
| Radeon HD 6970M X2 | 5,541.5 | +0% |
| Radeon R9 M385X | 5,514.5 | |
| Radeon Pro 455 | 5,388 | -2% |
| FirePro M6100 | 5,369 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M385X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 95.98 | +17% |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 90.17 | +10% |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 89.78 | +9% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 86.25 | +5% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 83.74 | +2% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 82.05 | |
| Radeon RX 480 | 78.25 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 77.83 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 74.36 | -9% |
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 72.9 | -11% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 6,303 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 6,759 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 22,544 | 93,095 (+312.95%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 3,404.5 | 16,024 (+370.67%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 75,385 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 4,456.5 | 21,539 (+383.32%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 44.8 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,994 | 12,914 (+547.64%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 266 | 816 (+206.77%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Strato | TU116 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 2,080 million | 6,600 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 Gb/s | 288 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,200 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 1,536 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 W | 120 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 300 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 896 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 1,536 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 14 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 24 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 56 | 96 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 48 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,100 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 17.6 GPixel/s | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 61.6 GTexel/s | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1.97 TFLOPS | 5.44 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 123.2 GFLOPS | 169.9 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R9 M385X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.