AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M375
3,3143% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 765M21% better
4,0194% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 765M has 21% better performance than the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M375
No data available
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M375 and the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M375
Shop GeForce GTX 765M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M375 GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M375 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tropo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M375 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M375 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,015 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M375 has the 288th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.17% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 765M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 765M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 797 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 863 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 765M has the 274th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q2 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Display FPS for Destiny 2
Destiny 2
Display FPS for Fortnite
Fortnite
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Radeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
Low - 720p
24 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
13 FPS
--
High - 1080p
12 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
10 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M375 orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 950M16+60%
Radeon R9 M37510
GeForce 940MX8-20%
GeForce 930MX7-30%
GeForce MX1307-30%
GeForce 920MX6-40%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M375 orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M375
3,3143% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 765M21% better
4,0194% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 765M has 21% better performance than the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M375 is ranked 288th with a score of 3,314, and the GeForce GTX 765M is ranked 274th with a score of 4,019.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M375
No data available
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M375 and the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M375 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro P5204,185.5+26%
Radeon 540X4,097+24%
GeForce GTX 765M4,019+21%
GeForce GTX 675MX3,978.5+20%
Quadro M6203,801+15%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369+2%
GeForce MX2303,363.5+1%
Radeon R9 M3753,314
GeForce 945M3,309.5-0%
Radeon R9 M2753,261-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M375 orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
8,466
17,616
(+108.08%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,667
2,479
(+48.71%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,269
4,083
(+24.9%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
45.5
88.3
(+94.07%)
PassMark G3D Mark
970
1,996
(+105.77%)
PassMark G2D Mark
164
285
(+73.78%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
35.8
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
27.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
CodenameTropoGK106
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,500 million2,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s64.13 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,002 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
Stream Processors (SP)640--
CUDA Cores--768
Compute Units (CU)10--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--4
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4064
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz797 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,015 MHz863 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
Pixel Fill Rate16.24 GPixel/s13.81 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate40.6 GTexel/s55.23 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,299 GFLOPS1,326 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance81.2 GFLOPS55.23 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M375GeForce GTX 765M
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.