AMD Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
3,637.53% of 104,598
Quadro M4000M182% better
10,25910% of 104,598

The Quadro M4000M has 182% better performance than the Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
No data available
Quadro M4000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) and the Quadro M4000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
Shop Quadro M4000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tropo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M370X has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,125 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 72 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M370X includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 775 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 800 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M370X has the 279th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.48% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2015. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M4000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M4000M includes 1,280 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 975 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,013 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M4000M has the 177th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Maxwell 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q3 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
Low - 768p
--
--
Medium - 768p
--
90 FPS
High - 1080p
--
55 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
48 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
20 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) orQuadro M4000M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) orQuadro M4000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
3,637.53% of 104,598
Quadro M4000M182% better
10,25910% of 104,598

The Quadro M4000M has 182% better performance than the Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) is ranked 279th with a score of 3,637.5, and the Quadro M4000M is ranked 177th with a score of 10,259.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
No data available
Quadro M4000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) and the Quadro M4000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) or
GPUBenchmark Performance
T600 Mobile10,498+189%
Radeon 680M10,371+185%
Quadro M4000M10,259+182%
GeForce MX55010,005+175%
GeForce GTX 970M9,877.5+172%
GeForce GTX 675MX3,978.5+9%
Quadro M6203,801+4%
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)3,637.5
GeForce GTX 670MX3,587-1%
Quadro K3100M3,581-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) orQuadro M4000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15,454.5
49,204
(+218.38%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,419
7,723
(+219.26%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,991
9,295.5
(+132.91%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
61.3
93.2
(+52.04%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,553
6,111
(+293.5%)
PassMark G2D Mark
355
401
(+12.96%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
CodenameTropoGM204
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Maxwell 2.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,500 million5,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth72 Gb/s160.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,125 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB48 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W100 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
Stream Processors (SP)640--
CUDA Cores--1,280
Compute Units (CU)10--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4080
Render Output Units (ROP)1664
Core Clock Speed775 MHz975 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)800 MHz1,013 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
Pixel Fill Rate12.8 GPixel/s64.83 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate32 GTexel/s81.04 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,024 GFLOPS2.59 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance64 GFLOPS81.04 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)Quadro M4000M
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.