AMD Radeon R9 M280X vs AMD FirePro W7170M

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M280X
4,6984% of 104,598
FirePro W7170M107% better
9,7089% of 104,598

The FirePro W7170M has 107% better performance than the Radeon R9 M280X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M280X
No data available
FirePro W7170M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M280X and the FirePro W7170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M280X
Shop FirePro W7170M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M280X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M280X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Saturn) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M280X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,375 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 88 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M280X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 900 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M280X has the 256th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.49% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD FirePro W7170M GPU

The AMD FirePro W7170M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The FirePro W7170M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FirePro W7170M includes 2,048 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 723 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The FirePro W7170M has the 183rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 2.0GCN 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2015Q4 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
Radeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
Low - 720p
66 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M280X orFirePro W7170M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX250122+85%
Radeon 540X113.5+72%
GeForce MX350104+58%
GeForce 930MX94+43%
GeForce MX23073.1+11%
Radeon R9 M280X65.9

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M280X orFirePro W7170M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M280X
4,6984% of 104,598
FirePro W7170M107% better
9,7089% of 104,598

The FirePro W7170M has 107% better performance than the Radeon R9 M280X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M280X is ranked 256th with a score of 4,698, and the FirePro W7170M is ranked 183rd with a score of 9,708.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M280X
No data available
FirePro W7170M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M280X and the FirePro W7170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M280X or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce MX55010,005+113%
GeForce GTX 970M9,877.5+110%
FirePro W7170M9,708+107%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile9,615.5+105%
Radeon R9 M390X9,448+101%
GeForce GTX 770M4,889+4%
GeForce MX3304,834+3%
Radeon R9 M280X4,698
Radeon RX 540 Mobile4,646-1%
GeForce MX2504,633-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M280X orFirePro W7170M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,012
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,041
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23,201
43,124
(+85.87%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,498
6,935
(+98.26%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,823
9,580
(+150.59%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
50.7
102.8
(+102.76%)
PassMark G3D Mark
814
3,162
(+288.45%)
PassMark G2D Mark
247
413
(+67.21%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
76.9
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
59.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
CodenameSaturnAmethyst
ArchitectureGCN 2.0GCN 3.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors2,080 million5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth88 Gb/s160 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,375 MHz1,250 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W100 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
Stream Processors (SP)8962,048
Compute Units (CU)1432
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)56128
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Core Clock Speed900 MHz723 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,000 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
Pixel Fill Rate16 GPixel/s23.14 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate56 GTexel/s92.54 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.79 TFLOPS2.96 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance112 GFLOPS185.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M280XFirePro W7170M
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.