AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M275
3,2613% of 104,598
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q437% better
17,52317% of 104,598

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has 437% better performance than the Radeon R9 M275 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M275
No data available
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M275 and the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M275
Shop Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M275 GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M275 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Venus) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M275 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M275 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 900 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 925 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M275 has the 290th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU106) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 3000 Max-Q has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 3000 Max-Q includes 1,920 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 600 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,215 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 120 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 240 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 30 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 3000 Max-Q has the 129th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Turing
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Hitman 3
Hitman 3
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Display FPS for DIRT 5
DIRT 5
Display FPS for Watch Dogs: Legion
Watch Dogs: Legion

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Hitman 3
Hitman 3
Radeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Low - 720p
--
178 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
100 FPS
High - 1080p
--
86 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
78 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
27 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M275 orQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M275 orQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M275
3,2613% of 104,598
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q437% better
17,52317% of 104,598

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has 437% better performance than the Radeon R9 M275 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M275 is ranked 290th with a score of 3,261, and the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is ranked 129th with a score of 17,523.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M275
No data available
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M275 and the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M275 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M275 orQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
5,048
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
5,357
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
11,459
66,284
(+478.44%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,885
13,617
(+622.39%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,182
16,577
(+420.96%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
50.5
202
(+300%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,115
8,255
(+640.36%)
PassMark G2D Mark
561
(+65.98%)
338
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
CodenameVenusTU106
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Turing
Process Size28 nm12 nm
Transistors1,500 million10,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Memory Size2 GB6 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s288 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit192 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB3 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--60 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Stream Processors (SP)640--
CUDA Cores--1,920
Compute Units (CU)10--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--30
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)40120
Render Output Units (ROP)1664
Tensor Cores--240
Ray Tracing Cores--30
Core Clock Speed900 MHz600 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)925 MHz1,215 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Pixel Fill Rate14.8 GPixel/s77.76 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate37 GTexel/s145.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,184 GFLOPS4.67 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance74 GFLOPS145.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.