AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs AMD Radeon Pro 560

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M275
3,2613% of 104,737
Radeon Pro 56063% better
5,3055% of 104,737

The Radeon Pro 560 has 63% better performance than the Radeon R9 M275 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M275
No data available
Radeon Pro 560
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M275 and the Radeon Pro 560 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M275
Shop Radeon Pro 560
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M275 GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M275 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Venus) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M275 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M275 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 900 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 925 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M275 has the 290th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.11% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro 560 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 560 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 560 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 560 has the 242nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 1.0GCN 4.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2017
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Radeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
Low - 720p
88 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
52 FPS
--
High - 768p
43 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
14 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M275 orRadeon Pro 560
GPUFrames Per Second
Quadro K1100M15.4+7%
GeForce 940M15+4%
Quadro K620M15+4%
GeForce 920MX15+4%
FirePro W4190M15+4%
Radeon R9 M27514.4
Quadro M500M14-3%
GeForce 840M14-3%
GeForce 845M13.9-3%
FirePro M400013-10%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M275 orRadeon Pro 560
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M275
3,2613% of 104,737
Radeon Pro 56063% better
5,3055% of 104,737

The Radeon Pro 560 has 63% better performance than the Radeon R9 M275 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M275 is ranked 290th with a score of 3,261, and the Radeon Pro 560 is ranked 242nd with a score of 5,305.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M275
No data available
Radeon Pro 560
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M275 and the Radeon Pro 560 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M275 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
FirePro M61005,369+65%
Quadro M12005,310+63%
Radeon Pro 5605,305+63%
GeForce GTX 960M5,278+62%
Radeon Pro 5555,185+59%
Radeon R9 M3753,314+2%
GeForce 945M3,309.5+1%
Radeon R9 M2753,261
Radeon HD 6990M3,227-1%
GeForce GTX 675M3,218-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M275 orRadeon Pro 560
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,376
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,519
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
11,459
23,105
(+101.63%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,885
3,892
(+106.47%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,182
5,718
(+79.7%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
50.5
86.8
(+71.88%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,115
3,475
(+211.66%)
PassMark G2D Mark
562
720
(+28.11%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
CodenameVenusPolaris 21
ArchitectureGCN 1.0GCN 4.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors1,500 million3,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s81.28 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz1,270 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
Stream Processors (SP)6401,024
Compute Units (CU)1016
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4064
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed900 MHz907 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)925 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
Pixel Fill Rate14.8 GPixel/s14.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate37 GTexel/s58.05 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,184 GFLOPS1.86 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance74 GFLOPS116.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M275Radeon Pro 560
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)2.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.