PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

AMD
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Radeon R9 M265X8% better
2,6333% of 104,937
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,937

The Radeon R9 M265X has 8% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M265X
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M265X and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M265X
Shop Quadro K3000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M265X GPU

The Radeon R9 M265X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q1 2014. Its Venus chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 1.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,000 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 64 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

The Radeon R9 M265X has the 317th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.51% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M GPU

The Quadro K3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q2 2012. Its GK104 chip that powers the GPU uses the Kepler architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 700 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 89.6 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This mobile card has a TDP of 75 W.

The Quadro K3000M has the 326th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.31% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2012
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Radeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
Low - 720p
118 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
63 FPS
--
High - 768p
54 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
20 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X orQuadro K3000M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X orQuadro K3000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M265X8% better
2,6333% of 104,937
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,937

The Radeon R9 M265X has 8% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M265X is ranked 317th with a score of 2,633, and the Quadro K3000M is ranked 326th with a score of 2,427.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M265X
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M265X and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro 5010M2,693+2%
Quadro M5202,658+1%
Radeon R9 M265X2,633
GeForce 940MX2,556-3%
GeForce GT 750M2,543-3%
Radeon HD 6950M2,452-7%
Quadro K620M2,434-8%
Quadro K3000M2,427-8%
FirePro M60002,422-8%
GeForce 940M2,405.5-9%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X orQuadro K3000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
12,510
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,997
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,925.5
(+5.73%)
2,767
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
58.7
--
PassMark G3D Mark
1,138
1,638
(+43.94%)
PassMark G2D Mark
211
340
(+61.14%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
CodenameVenusGK104
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,500 million3,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s89.6 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz700 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
Stream Processors (SP)640--
CUDA Cores--576
Compute Units (CU)10--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--3
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4048
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Core Clock Speed575 MHz654 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)625 MHz654 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
Pixel Fill Rate10 GPixel/s7.85 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate25 GTexel/s31.39 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance800 GFLOPS753.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance50 GFLOPS31.39 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XQuadro K3000M
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.