AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M265X
2,6333% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile664% better
20,118.519% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 664% better performance than the Radeon R9 M265X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M265X
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M265X and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M265X
Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M265X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M265X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Venus) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M265X has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M265X includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 575 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 625 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M265X has the 321st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,455 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,590 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has the 110th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 19.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Turing
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Skull & Bones
Skull & Bones
Display FPS for Enshrouded
Enshrouded
Display FPS for Palworld
Palworld
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Radeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Low - 1080p
--
73 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
56 FPS
High - 1080p
--
55 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
54 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M265X
2,6333% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile664% better
20,118.519% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 664% better performance than the Radeon R9 M265X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M265X is ranked 321st with a score of 2,633, and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ranked 110th with a score of 20,118.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M265X
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M265X and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q22,089+739%
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile21,261.5+708%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile20,118.5+664%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile19,878.5+655%
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q19,778.5+651%
Quadro 5010M2,693+2%
Quadro M5202,658+1%
Radeon R9 M265X2,633
GeForce 940MX2,556-3%
GeForce GT 750M2,543-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
5,659
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
5,697
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
12,510
97,517
(+679.51%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,997
14,818
(+642.01%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
66,325
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,925.5
17,351
(+493.1%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
58.7
120.6
(+105.45%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,133
10,190
(+799.38%)
PassMark G2D Mark
207
487
(+135.27%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
CodenameVenusTU116
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Turing
Process Size28 nm12 nm
Transistors1,500 million6,600 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Memory Size2 GB6 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s288 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit192 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1,536 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--80 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Stream Processors (SP)640--
CUDA Cores--1,536
Compute Units (CU)10--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--24
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4096
Render Output Units (ROP)1648
Core Clock Speed575 MHz1,455 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)625 MHz1,590 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate10 GPixel/s76.32 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate25 GTexel/s152.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance800 GFLOPS4.88 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance50 GFLOPS152.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.