AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 M265X54% better
2,6333% of 104,598
GeForce GT 735M
1,7132% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M265X has 54% better performance than the GeForce GT 735M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M265X
No data available
GeForce GT 735M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M265X and the GeForce GT 735M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 M265X
Shop GeForce GT 735M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 M265X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M265X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Venus) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M265X has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M265X includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 575 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 625 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M265X has the 321st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 735M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 735M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 575 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 628 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 735M has the 392nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Radeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
Low - 720p
118 FPS(+84.38%)
64 FPS
Medium - 768p
63 FPS(+85.29%)
34 FPS
High - 768p
54 FPS(+86.21%)
29 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
20 FPS(+141.55%)
8 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X or

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X orGeForce GT 735M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 M265X54% better
2,6333% of 104,598
GeForce GT 735M
1,7132% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M265X has 54% better performance than the GeForce GT 735M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 M265X is ranked 321st with a score of 2,633, and the GeForce GT 735M is ranked 392nd with a score of 1,713.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 M265X
No data available
GeForce GT 735M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R9 M265X and the GeForce GT 735M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro 5010M2,693+2%
Quadro M5202,658+1%
Radeon R9 M265X2,633
GeForce 940MX2,556-3%
GeForce GT 750M2,543-3%
GeForce GT 730M1,722-35%
GeForce 920M1,718.5-35%
GeForce GT 735M1,713-35%
Radeon HD 8750M1,698-36%
Radeon R5 M3301,689-36%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 M265X orGeForce GT 735M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
12,510
(+85.14%)
6,757
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,997
(+95.11%)
1,023.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,925.5
(+63.34%)
1,791
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
58.7
(+19.31%)
49.2
PassMark G3D Mark
1,133
(+74.85%)
648
PassMark G2D Mark
207
(+61.72%)
128
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
CodenameVenusGK208
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler 2.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,500 million1,020 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--33 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
Stream Processors (SP)640--
CUDA Cores--384
Compute Units (CU)10--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4032
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed575 MHz575 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)625 MHz628 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
Pixel Fill Rate10 GPixel/s5.02 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate25 GTexel/s20.1 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance800 GFLOPS482.3 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance50 GFLOPS20.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 M265XGeForce GT 735M
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.