Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R9 290X
16,167.515% of 104,598
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)12% better
18,05817% of 104,598
The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 12% better performance than the Radeon R9 290X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 290X
29.4518% of 161.45
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available
The Radeon R9 290X has 18% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon R9 290X
Shop RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R9 290X GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 290X is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2013 with a MSRP of $549. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Hawaii) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 290X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 512 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 320 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 290X includes 2,816 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 176 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 290X occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 290 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 290X has the 137th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 15.46% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 16,167.5 score and $549 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 29.45. This is the 80th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) GPU
The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is a graphics card by NVIDIA. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX A2000 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 893 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q4 2013 | -- |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $549 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Dota 2 - Reborn
The Witcher 3
GTA V
CS: GO
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 768p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | 61 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 33 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 290X orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 49.4 | +49% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 41.2 | +24% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 38.7 | +17% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 35.6 | +8% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 33.4 | +1% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 33.1 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.4 | -2% |
| Radeon RX 570 | 32 | -3% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 31 | -6% |
| Radeon RX 470 | 30 | -9% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 290X orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 9.65 | -42% |
| Radeon VII | 9.99 | -40% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 11.71 | -29% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 15.42 | -7% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 15.75 | -5% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16.59 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 16.94 | +2% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 56.07 | +238% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R9 290X
16,167.515% of 104,598
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)12% better
18,05817% of 104,598
The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 12% better performance than the Radeon R9 290X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 290X is ranked 137th with a score of 16,167.5, and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 290X
29.4518% of 161.45
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available
The Radeon R9 290X has 45% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon R9 290X's 29.45 performance per dollar ranks it 80th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 290X or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 19,778.5 | +22% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | 18,688 | +16% |
| RTX A2000 Mobile | 18,058 | +12% |
| RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) | 18,058 | +12% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 18,057 | +12% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 17,401 | +8% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 17,282 | +7% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 290X orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | +23% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 35.53 | +21% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | +9% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | +9% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | +9% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | -4% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -24% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -30% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 4,003 | 5,016 (+25.31%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4,114 | 5,523 (+34.25%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 73,987 (+22.62%) | 60,336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 11,717 | 13,157 (+12.29%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 13,415 | 17,348 (+29.32%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 142 | 311 (+119.01%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 8,623 | 10,944 (+26.92%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 765 (+42.72%) | 536 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 140 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 111 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Hawaii | -- |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistors | 6,200 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 Gb/s | 192 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,250 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 512 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 W | 95 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 2,816 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 2,560 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 44 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 176 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 20 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,000 MHz | 893 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,687 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 64 GPixel/s | -- |
| Texture Fill Rate | 176 GTexel/s | -- |
| FP32 Performance | 5.63 TFLOPS | 9.3 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 704 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | -- |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | -- |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.