PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Radeon R9 290X201% better
16,167.515% of 104,937
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5,3785% of 104,937

The Radeon R9 290X has 201% better performance than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 290X
29.4518% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 750 Ti23% better
36.0922% of 161.45

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 23% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 290X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 290X
Shop GeForce GTX 750 Ti
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 290X GPU

The Radeon R9 290X is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q4 2013 with a suggested retail price of $549. Its Hawaii chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,250 MHz memory clock and 512 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 320 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

The R9 290X is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 290 W. AMD recommends using a power supply of at least 600 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

The Radeon R9 290X has the 135th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 15.41% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 16,167.5 score and $549 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 29.45. This is the 78th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2014 with a suggested retail price of $149. Its GM107 chip that powers the GPU uses the Maxwell architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,350 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

The GTX 750 Ti is a compact, low-profile graphics card, taking up 1 PCIe slot. It supports DVI, mini-HDMI 1.4a display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 60 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 250 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has the 234th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 5,378 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 36.09. This is the 70th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Maxwell
Market SegmentDesktopDesktop
Release DateQ4 2013Q1 2014
Launch Price (MSRP)$549$149
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Radeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
Low - 720p
--
--
Medium - 768p
--
--
High - 1080p
61 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
33 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 290X orGeForce GTX 750 Ti

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 290X orGeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPUCost Per Frame
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)9.65-42%
Radeon VII9.99-40%
GeForce GTX 97011.71-29%
Radeon R9 FURY15.42-7%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti15.75-5%
Radeon R9 290X16.59
GeForce GTX 98016.94+2%
GeForce GTX 68056.07+238%

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 290X201% better
16,167.515% of 104,937
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5,3785% of 104,937

The Radeon R9 290X has 201% better performance than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 290X is ranked 135th with a score of 16,167.5, and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is ranked 234th with a score of 5,378.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 290X
29.4518% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 750 Ti23% better
36.0922% of 161.45

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 23% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 290X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 290X is ranked 78th with a performance per dollar of 29.45, and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is ranked 70th with a performance per dollar of 36.09.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 290X or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 290X or
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 97048.73+65%
Radeon R9 390X41.83+42%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti36.09+23%
Radeon R9 280X36.09+23%
GeForce GTX 98032.07+9%
GeForce GTX 76031.98+9%
Radeon R9 FURY31.95+9%
Radeon R9 290X29.45
GeForce GTX 660 Ti28.14-4%
Radeon R9 Nano26.63-10%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,003
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,114
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
73,987
(+136.01%)
31,349
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
11,717
(+172.87%)
4,294
3DMark 11 Performance Score
13,415
(+133.67%)
5,741
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
142
--
PassMark G3D Mark
8,638
(+121.32%)
3,903
PassMark G2D Mark
771
(+49.13%)
517
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
140
(+157.83%)
54.3
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
111
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
CodenameHawaiiGM107
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Maxwell
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors6,200 million1,870 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth320 Gb/s86.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz1,350 MHz
Memory Interface512 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
Slots2 slots1 slot
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)290 W60 W
Suggested PSU600 W250 W
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin--
OutputsDVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2DVI, mini-HDMI 1.4a

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
Stream Processors (SP)2,816--
CUDA Cores--640
Compute Units (CU)44--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)17640
Render Output Units (ROP)6416
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz1,020 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,085 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
Pixel Fill Rate64 GPixel/s17.36 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate176 GTexel/s43.4 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance5.63 TFLOPS1,389 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance704 GFLOPS43.4 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 290XGeForce GTX 750 Ti
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.