Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R9 280X
10,79210% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile86% better
20,118.519% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 86% better performance than the Radeon R9 280X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 280X
36.0922% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No data available
The Radeon R9 280X has 22% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon R9 280X
Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R9 280X GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 280X is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2013 with a MSRP of $299. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tahiti) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 280X has 3 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 280X includes 2,048 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 280X occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 280X has the 171st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 10,792 score and $299 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 36.09. This is the 73rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,455 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,590 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has the 110th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 19.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q4 2013 | Q2 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $299 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
Skull & Bones
Enshrouded
Palworld
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Ready or Not
The Finals
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 73 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 56 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 55 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 54 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 280X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6600M | 69 | +28% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | 65.4 | +21% |
| Radeon RX 7600M | 61.3 | +14% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 54 | |
| Radeon RX 5500M | 34.5 | -36% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 33.3 | -38% |
| Arc A730M | 33 | -39% |
| GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 33 | -39% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | 28.9 | -46% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 280X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R9 280X
10,79210% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile86% better
20,118.519% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 86% better performance than the Radeon R9 280X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 280X is ranked 171st with a score of 10,792, and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ranked 110th with a score of 20,118.5.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 280X
36.0922% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No data available
The Radeon R9 280X has 55% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon R9 280X's 36.09 performance per dollar ranks it 73rd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 280X or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 22,089 | +105% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 21,261.5 | +97% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 20,118.5 | +86% |
| Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile | 19,878.5 | +84% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 19,778.5 | +83% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | +26% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | +13% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 10,767.5 | -0% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 10,216.5 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 280X orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 960 | 54.11 | +50% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 52.52 | +46% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 48.73 | +35% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 41.83 | +16% |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 36.09 | +0% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | -11% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | -11% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | -11% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | -18% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 2,210 | 5,659 (+156.06%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2,393 | 5,697 (+138.07%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 52,117 | 97,517 (+87.11%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 8,343 | 14,818 (+77.61%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 66,325 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 10,241 | 17,351 (+69.43%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 120.6 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 6,178 | 10,190 (+64.94%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 686 (+40.86%) | 487 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 95.2 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Tahiti | TU116 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 4,313 million | 6,600 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 Gb/s | 288 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,500 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 384 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 1,536 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 80 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 2,048 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 1,536 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 32 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 24 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 128 | 96 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 48 |
| Core Clock Speed | 850 MHz | 1,455 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,000 MHz | 1,590 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 32 GPixel/s | 76.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 128 GTexel/s | 152.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 4.1 TFLOPS | 4.88 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 1,024 GFLOPS | 152.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.