Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R9 280X
10,79210% of 104,598
Radeon PRO W6800311% better
44,40442% of 104,598
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 311% better performance than the Radeon R9 280X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 280X83% better
36.0922% of 161.45
Radeon PRO W6800
19.7412% of 161.45
The Radeon R9 280X has 83% better value for the money than the Radeon PRO W6800 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon R9 280X
Shop Radeon PRO W6800
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R9 280X GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 280X is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2013 with a MSRP of $299. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tahiti) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 280X has 3 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 280X includes 2,048 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 280X occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 280X has the 171st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 10,792 score and $299 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 36.09. This is the 73rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 GPU
The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q2 2021 with a MSRP of $2,249. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 21) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.
Memory
The PRO W6800 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The PRO W6800 includes 3,840 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,075 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,320 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 60 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The PRO W6800 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The PRO W6800 has the 30th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 42.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 44,404 score and $2,249 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 19.74. This is the 86th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release Date | Q4 2013 | Q2 2021 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $299 | $2,249 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 2020
Far Cry New Dawn
Metro Exodus
Strange Brigade
Fortnite
X-Plane 11
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 2020 | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 300 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 283 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 225 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 179 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 109 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 280X orRadeon PRO W6800
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A6000 | 137 | +26% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 109 | |
| RTX A2000 | 38.8 | -64% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 38.8 | -64% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 280X orRadeon PRO W6800
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 | 11.57 | -44% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 11.57 | -44% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 20.63 | |
| RTX A6000 | 33.93 | +64% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R9 280X
10,79210% of 104,598
Radeon PRO W6800311% better
44,40442% of 104,598
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 311% better performance than the Radeon R9 280X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 280X is ranked 171st with a score of 10,792, and the Radeon PRO W6800 is ranked 30th with a score of 44,404.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 280X83% better
36.0922% of 161.45
Radeon PRO W6800
19.7412% of 161.45
The Radeon R9 280X has 83% better value for the money than the Radeon PRO W6800 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 280X is ranked 73rd with a performance per dollar of 36.09, and the Radeon PRO W6800 is ranked 86th with a performance per dollar of 19.74.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 280X or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 6000 Ada Generation | 70,850 | +557% |
| RTX A6000 | 50,957 | +372% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 44,404 | +311% |
| Quadro P5000 | 20,096 | +86% |
| RTX A2000 | 19,978 | +85% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | +26% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | +13% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 10,767.5 | -0% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 10,216.5 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 280X or
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 44.49 | +23% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 41.83 | +16% |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 36.09 | +0% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | -11% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | -11% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 21.8 | -40% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 19.74 | -45% |
| Quadro P4000 | 18.94 | -48% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3100 | 18.55 | -49% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 2,210 | 12,136 (+449.14%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2,393 | 11,941 (+399%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 52,117 | 92,363 (+77.22%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 8,343 | 27,937 (+234.86%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 131,421 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 10,241 | 30,190 (+194.8%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 177.7 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 6,178 | 19,791 (+220.35%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 686 | 933 (+36.01%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 95.2 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 21 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors | 4,313 million | 26,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 3 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 Gb/s | 512 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,500 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 250 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 2,048 | 3,840 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 32 | 60 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 128 | 240 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 96 |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 60 |
| Core Clock Speed | 850 MHz | 2,075 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,000 MHz | 2,320 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 32 GPixel/s | 222.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 128 GTexel/s | 556.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 4.1 TFLOPS | 17.82 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 1,024 GFLOPS | 1,114 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.