AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs AMD Radeon R5 (Beema)
The Radeon R8 M365DX has 275% better performance than the Radeon R5 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R8 M365DX and the Radeon R5 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX GPU
The AMD Radeon R8 M365DX is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Meso) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R8 M365DX includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 900 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,125 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R8 M365DX has the 308th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R5 (Beema) GPU
The Radeon R5 (Beema) is an graphics card by AMD. It is built on the GCN 1.1 GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R5 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks.
Benchmark Performance
The R5 has the 482nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.1 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2015 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | 21 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 16 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 11 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 12 | +5% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 11.4 | |
| Radeon R8 M445DX | 8 | -30% |
| UHD Graphics 620 | 7 | -39% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 6.5 | -43% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon R8 M365DX has 275% better performance than the Radeon R5 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R8 M365DX is ranked 308th with a score of 2,862.5, and the Radeon R5 (Beema) is ranked 482nd with a score of 764.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R8 M365DX and the Radeon R5 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | +4% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | +1% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | -3% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 2,762 | -4% |
| Radeon HD 8470D | 854 | -70% |
| HD Graphics 510 | 847 | -70% |
| Radeon R5 (Beema) | 764 | -73% |
| HD Graphics 4400 | 735.5 | -74% |
| Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | 730.5 | -74% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 11,291 (+240.4%) | 3,317 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,902 (+252.88%) | 539 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,505.5 (+201.5%) | 831 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 32.3 (+90%) | 17 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 647 | -- |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 197 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Meso | -- |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.1 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1,550 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | -- |
| Memory Type | System Shared | -- |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | -- |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | -- |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | IGP | -- |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 384 | 128 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | -- |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 900 MHz | -- |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,125 MHz | 850 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 9 GPixel/s | -- |
| Texture Fill Rate | 27 GTexel/s | -- |
| FP32 Performance | 864 GFLOPS | -- |
| FP64 Performance | 54 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | -- |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | -- |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | -- |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.