AMD Radeon R7 M340 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

VS
Performance
Radeon R7 M340
2,1482% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q437% better
11,53811% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 437% better performance than the Radeon R7 M340 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M340
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M340 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R7 M340
Shop GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R7 M340 GPU

The AMD Radeon R7 M340 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Meso) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R7 M340 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 16 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R7 M340 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 943 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,021 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R7 M340 has the 352nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,035 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has the 165th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.03% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Turing
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q2 2020
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Display FPS for Watch Dogs: Legion
Watch Dogs: Legion

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Radeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Low - 720p
--
154 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
60 FPS
High - 1080p
--
32 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
24 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M340 orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M340 orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R7 M340
2,1482% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q437% better
11,53811% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 437% better performance than the Radeon R7 M340 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R7 M340 is ranked 352nd with a score of 2,148, and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is ranked 165th with a score of 11,538.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M340
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M340 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M340 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Arc A370M12,089.5+463%
Quadro M5000M11,845+451%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q11,538+437%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q11,461+434%
Quadro T1000 Mobile11,377+430%
GeForce GTX 480M2,184.5+2%
GeForce 930M2,153+0%
Radeon R7 M3402,148
Radeon R7 M4602,139-0%
GeForce MX1102,121-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M340 orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
3,098
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
3,235.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6,153
47,657
(+674.53%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,208.5
8,564
(+608.65%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,268
11,398
(+402.56%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
33.5
140
(+317.91%)
PassMark G3D Mark
655
6,410
(+878.63%)
PassMark G2D Mark
151
335
(+121.85%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
CodenameMesoTU117
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Turing
Process Size28 nm12 nm
Transistors1,550 million4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth16 Gb/s160 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz1,250 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Stream Processors (SP)320--
CUDA Cores--1,024
Compute Units (CU)5--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--16
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2064
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Core Clock Speed943 MHz1,035 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,021 MHz1,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Pixel Fill Rate8.17 GPixel/s38.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate20.42 GTexel/s76.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance653.4 GFLOPS2.46 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance40.84 GFLOPS76.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R7 M340GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.