AMD Radeon R7 M340 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile has 511% better performance than the Radeon R7 M340 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M340 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon R7 M340 GPU
The AMD Radeon R7 M340 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Meso) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R7 M340 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 16 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R7 M340 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 943 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,021 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R7 M340 has the 352nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1650 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1650 Mobile includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,380 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,515 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 1650 Mobile has the 155th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 12.54% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2015 | Q2 2020 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 53 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 32 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 32 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 30 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500M | 34.5 | +15% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 34.1 | +13% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | 33.9 | +13% |
| GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 33 | +10% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 30.1 | |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | 28.9 | -4% |
| Arc A370M | 11.4 | -62% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile has 511% better performance than the Radeon R7 M340 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R7 M340 is ranked 352nd with a score of 2,148, and the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is ranked 155th with a score of 13,131.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M340 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | 13,333.5 | +521% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 13,266 | +518% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 13,131.5 | +511% |
| GeForce GTX 980M | 12,517 | +483% |
| Radeon Pro Vega 20 | 12,289 | +472% |
| GeForce GTX 480M | 2,184.5 | +2% |
| GeForce 930M | 2,153 | +0% |
| Radeon R7 M340 | 2,148 | |
| Radeon R7 M460 | 2,139 | -0% |
| GeForce MX110 | 2,121 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 3,488 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 3,595.5 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 6,153 | 57,365 (+832.31%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,208.5 | 9,313 (+670.62%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 38,744 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,268 | 11,788 (+419.75%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 33.5 | 103.6 (+209.25%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 657 | 6,969 (+960.73%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 153 | 385 (+151.63%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 100.6 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 97.6 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Meso | TU117 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 1,550 million | 4,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gb/s | 192 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 50 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 320 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 1,024 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 5 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 16 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 20 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 943 MHz | 1,380 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,021 MHz | 1,515 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 8.17 GPixel/s | 48.48 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 20.42 GTexel/s | 96.96 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 653.4 GFLOPS | 3.1 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 40.84 GFLOPS | 96.96 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M340 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.