AMD Radeon R7 M270 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

VS
Performance
Radeon R7 M270
1,857.52% of 104,598
RTX A500 Mobile482% better
10,81810% of 104,598

The RTX A500 Mobile has 482% better performance than the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M270
No data available
RTX A500 Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M270 and the RTX A500 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R7 M270
Shop RTX A500 Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R7 M270 GPU

The AMD Radeon R7 M270 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Opal) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R7 M270 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R7 M270 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 725 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 825 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R7 M270 has the 370th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.78% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA107S) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A500 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A500 Mobile includes 2,048 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 832 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,537 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 64 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 16 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A500 Mobile has the 170th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.34% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Ampere
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q1 2022
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Last Epoch
Last Epoch
Display FPS for Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2
Display FPS for Enshrouded
Enshrouded

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
Low - 1080p
--
82 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
72 FPS
High - 1080p
--
33 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
12 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M270 orRTX A500 Mobile
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile49.2+321%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile15.4+32%
GeForce MX45013.4+15%
RTX A500 Mobile11.7
Radeon 680M7.41-37%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M270 orRTX A500 Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R7 M270
1,857.52% of 104,598
RTX A500 Mobile482% better
10,81810% of 104,598

The RTX A500 Mobile has 482% better performance than the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R7 M270 is ranked 370th with a score of 1,857.5, and the RTX A500 Mobile is ranked 170th with a score of 10,818.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M270
No data available
RTX A500 Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M270 and the RTX A500 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M270 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 7970M X211,119+499%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+497%
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+482%
Arc A350M10,730+478%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+469%
Radeon R7 M2601,897+2%
Radeon R7 M2651,882+1%
Radeon R7 M2701,857.5
GeForce GT 740M1,848-1%
GeForce GT 645M1,844.5-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M270 orRTX A500 Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
2,994.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
3,273
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6,364.5
48,495.5
(+661.97%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,258
7,597.5
(+503.93%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,014
11,288.5
(+460.5%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
37.4
247
(+560.43%)
PassMark G3D Mark
767
6,740
(+778.75%)
PassMark G2D Mark
155
434
(+180%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
23.9
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
21.1
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
CodenameOpalGA107S
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Ampere
Process Size28 nm8 nm
Transistors950 million8,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s96 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--60 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
Stream Processors (SP)384--
CUDA Cores--2,048
Compute Units (CU)6--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--16
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2464
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Tensor Cores--64
Ray Tracing Cores--16
Core Clock Speed725 MHz832 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)825 MHz1,537 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate6.6 GPixel/s49.18 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate19.8 GTexel/s98.37 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance633.6 GFLOPS6.3 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--98.37 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R7 M270RTX A500 Mobile
DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.