AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

VS
Performance
Radeon R7 M265
1,8822% of 104,598
GeForce MX150139% better
4,4944% of 104,598

The GeForce MX150 has 139% better performance than the Radeon R7 M265 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M265
No data available
GeForce MX150
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M265 and the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R7 M265
Shop GeForce MX150
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R7 M265 GPU

The AMD Radeon R7 M265 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Opal) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R7 M265 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R7 M265 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 725 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 825 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R7 M265 has the 369th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX150 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX150 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX150 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,469 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,532 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX150 has the 262nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Pascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2017
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Display FPS for Ghostwire: Tokyo
Ghostwire: Tokyo
Display FPS for ELEX 2
ELEX 2
Display FPS for Elden Ring
Elden Ring

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
Radeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
Low - 1080p
--
--
Medium - 1080p
--
15 FPS
High - 1080p
--
9 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
7 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M265 orGeForce MX150
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile38.2+474%
GeForce MX1506.66

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M265 orGeForce MX150
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R7 M265
1,8822% of 104,598
GeForce MX150139% better
4,4944% of 104,598

The GeForce MX150 has 139% better performance than the Radeon R7 M265 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R7 M265 is ranked 369th with a score of 1,882, and the GeForce MX150 is ranked 262nd with a score of 4,494.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M265
No data available
GeForce MX150
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M265 and the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M265 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon RX 550 Mobile4,559+142%
Radeon Pro 4504,502+139%
GeForce MX1504,494+139%
GeForce GTX 850M4,385.5+133%
GeForce GTX 950M4,367+132%
Radeon R7 M260X1,903+1%
Radeon R7 M2601,897+1%
Radeon R7 M2651,882
Radeon R7 M2701,857.5-1%
GeForce GT 740M1,848-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M265 orGeForce MX150
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,046
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,132.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
8,401.5
19,132
(+127.72%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,336
3,488
(+161.08%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,012
4,576
(+127.44%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
32.9
94.1
(+186.02%)
PassMark G3D Mark
546
2,273
(+316.3%)
PassMark G2D Mark
138
216
(+56.52%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
41.8
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
CodenameOpalGP108
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Pascal
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors950 million1,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s48.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,502 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB48 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--25 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
Stream Processors (SP)384--
CUDA Cores--384
Compute Units (CU)6--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--3
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2424
Render Output Units (ROP)816
Core Clock Speed725 MHz1,469 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)825 MHz1,532 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
Pixel Fill Rate6.6 GPixel/s24.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate19.8 GTexel/s36.77 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance633.6 GFLOPS1,177 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance--36.77 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R7 M265GeForce MX150
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.