Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R7 M260X
1,9032% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 40703,051% better
59,96957% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 3,051% better performance than the Radeon R7 M260X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M260X
No data available
GeForce RTX 4070
100.1262% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 62% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon R7 M260X
Shop GeForce RTX 4070
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R7 M260X GPU
The AMD Radeon R7 M260X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Opal) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R7 M260X has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R7 M260X includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 620 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 715 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R7 M260X has the 367th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.82% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2023 with a MSRP of $599. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD104) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, with a 1,313 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 504.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4070 includes 5,888 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,920 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,475 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 184 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 184 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 46 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 4070 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 550 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 200 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 4070 has the 17th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 57.33% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 59,969 score and $599 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 100.12. This is the 15th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q4 2015 | Q2 2023 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $599 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
F1 23
Diablo 4
Far Cry 6
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
The Last of Us
Resident Evil 4 (Remake)
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 133 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 126 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 123 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 120 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 100 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 60 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X orGeForce RTX 4070
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 77.6 | +30% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 75 | +26% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 70 | +17% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 69.5 | +16% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 68.6 | +15% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 59.7 | |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 59 | -1% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 54.6 | -9% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 51.7 | -13% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 50.5 | -15% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X orGeForce RTX 4070
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 9.65 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 9.66 | -4% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 9.7 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 9.7 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 9.88 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 10.03 | |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 10.06 | +0% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 10.45 | +4% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 10.6 | +6% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 11.65 | +16% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R7 M260X
1,9032% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 40703,051% better
59,96957% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 3,051% better performance than the Radeon R7 M260X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R7 M260X is ranked 367th with a score of 1,903, and the GeForce RTX 4070 is ranked 17th with a score of 59,969.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M260X
No data available
GeForce RTX 4070
100.1262% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 153% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX 4070's 100.12 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 61,518 | +3,133% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 60,980 | +3,104% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 59,969 | +3,051% |
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | 59,119 | +3,007% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 57,340 | +2,913% |
| GeForce 830M | 1,961 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 8770M | 1,934 | +2% |
| Radeon R7 M260X | 1,903 | |
| Radeon R7 M260 | 1,897 | -0% |
| Radeon R7 M265 | 1,882 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X orGeForce RTX 4070
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 127.71 | +28% |
| Arc A770 | 125.54 | +25% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 119.81 | +20% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 114.15 | +14% |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | +3% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 100.12 | |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 95.14 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 95.09 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 94.63 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 93.66 | -6% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 17,837 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 17,905 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 9,034 | 193,559 (+2,042.56%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,396 | 43,824 (+3,039.26%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 187,585 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,114 | 49,045.5 (+2,220.03%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 36.4 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,001 | 26,972 (+2,594.51%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 165 | 1,114 (+575.15%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Opal | AD104 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 950 million | 35,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 Gb/s | 504.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 1,313 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 36 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 200 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 550 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 16-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 384 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 5,888 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 46 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 184 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 184 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 46 |
| Core Clock Speed | 620 MHz | 1,920 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 715 MHz | 2,475 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 5.72 GPixel/s | 158.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 17.16 GTexel/s | 455.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 549.1 GFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 455.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.