Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R7 M260X
1,9032% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 750 Ti183% better
5,3785% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 183% better performance than the Radeon R7 M260X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M260X
No data available
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36.0922% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 22% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon R7 M260X
Shop GeForce GTX 750 Ti
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R7 M260X GPU
The AMD Radeon R7 M260X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Opal) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R7 M260X has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R7 M260X includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 620 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 715 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R7 M260X has the 367th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.82% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q1 2014 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 750 Ti includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,085 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 750 Ti is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports DVI, mini-HDMI 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 750 Ti has the 237th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 5,378 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 36.09. This is the 72nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q4 2015 | Q1 2014 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $149 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
BioShock Infinite | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 233 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | 45 FPS | 140 FPS(+211.8%) |
| High - 768p | 39 FPS | 122 FPS(+210.94%) |
| Ultra - 1080p | 14 FPS | 47 FPS(+245.93%) |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X or
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 680 | 62 | +359% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 56 | +315% |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 46.7 | +246% |
| GeForce GT 1030 | 37 | +174% |
| GeForce GTX 470 | 32.8 | +143% |
| Quadro K2100M | 14 | +4% |
| Radeon R7 M445 | 13.8 | +2% |
| Radeon R7 M260X | 13.5 | |
| FirePro M4000 | 13 | -4% |
| GeForce GT 745M | 13 | -4% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X orGeForce GTX 750 Ti
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 950 | 2.52 | -21% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 2.63 | -18% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 2.63 | -17% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 2.66 | -17% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 2.91 | -9% |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 3.19 | |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 3.81 | +20% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 3.82 | +20% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 3.92 | +23% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 4.73 | +48% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R7 M260X
1,9032% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 750 Ti183% better
5,3785% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 183% better performance than the Radeon R7 M260X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R7 M260X is ranked 367th with a score of 1,903, and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is ranked 237th with a score of 5,378.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M260X
No data available
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36.0922% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 55% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 36.09 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7970 | 7,770 | +308% |
| Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | 6,194 | +225% |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 5,378 | +183% |
| GeForce GTX 480 | 5,014 | +163% |
| GeForce GT 1030 | 4,727.5 | +148% |
| GeForce 830M | 1,961 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 8770M | 1,934 | +2% |
| Radeon R7 M260X | 1,903 | |
| Radeon R7 M260 | 1,897 | -0% |
| Radeon R7 M265 | 1,882 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X orGeForce GTX 750 Ti
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R7 370 | 57.17 | +58% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 54.11 | +50% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 52.52 | +46% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 48.73 | +35% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 41.83 | +16% |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 36.09 | |
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | -0% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | -11% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | -11% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | -11% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 9,034 | 31,349 (+247.01%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,396 | 4,294 (+207.59%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,114 | 5,741 (+171.57%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 36.4 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,001 | 3,901 (+289.71%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 165 | 516 (+212.73%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 54.3 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Opal | GM107 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 950 million | 1,870 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 Gb/s | 86.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 1,350 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 1 slot |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 60 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, mini-HDMI 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 384 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 640 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 40 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 620 MHz | 1,020 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 715 MHz | 1,085 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 5.72 GPixel/s | 17.36 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 17.16 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 549.1 GFLOPS | 1,389 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 43.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.