AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

VS
Performance
Radeon R7 M260X50% better
1,9032% of 104,598
GeForce 820M
1,266.51% of 104,598

The Radeon R7 M260X has 50% better performance than the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M260X
No data available
GeForce 820M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M260X and the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R7 M260X
Shop GeForce 820M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R7 M260X GPU

The AMD Radeon R7 M260X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Opal) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R7 M260X has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R7 M260X includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 620 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 715 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R7 M260X has the 367th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.82% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce 820M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 820M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2013. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF117B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 820M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 820M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 625 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 820M has the 425th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Fermi 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2015Q4 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Radeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
Low - 720p
--
56 FPS
Medium - 768p
45 FPS(+44.84%)
31 FPS
High - 768p
39 FPS(+51.15%)
26 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
14 FPS(+66.67%)
8 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X or
GPUFrames Per Second
Quadro K2100M14+4%
Radeon R7 M44513.8+2%
Radeon R7 M260X13.5
FirePro M400013-4%
GeForce GT 745M13-4%
GeForce GT 735M8.28-39%
Radeon R5 M4308.2-39%
GeForce 820M8.1-40%
Radeon R5 M3308-41%
Radeon R5 M3357.8-42%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X orGeForce 820M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R7 M260X50% better
1,9032% of 104,598
GeForce 820M
1,266.51% of 104,598

The Radeon R7 M260X has 50% better performance than the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R7 M260X is ranked 367th with a score of 1,903, and the GeForce 820M is ranked 425th with a score of 1,266.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M260X
No data available
GeForce 820M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M260X and the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce 830M1,961+3%
Radeon HD 8770M1,934+2%
Radeon R7 M260X1,903
Radeon R7 M2601,897-0%
Radeon R7 M2651,882-1%
Radeon HD 6770M1,328-30%
Radeon HD 8550M1,307-31%
GeForce 820M1,266.5-33%
Quadro 2000M1,261-34%
GeForce GT 640M LE1,259-34%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260X orGeForce 820M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
9,034
(+48.74%)
6,073.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,396
(+55.63%)
897
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,114
(+52.86%)
1,383
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
36.4
(+2.25%)
35.6
PassMark G3D Mark
1,001
(+102.22%)
495
PassMark G2D Mark
165
(+44.74%)
114
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
CodenameOpalGF117B
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Fermi 2.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors950 million585 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
Memory Size1,024 MB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
Stream Processors (SP)384--
CUDA Cores--96
Compute Units (CU)6--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2416
Render Output Units (ROP)88
Core Clock Speed620 MHz625 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)715 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
Pixel Fill Rate5.72 GPixel/s2.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate17.16 GTexel/s10 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance549.1 GFLOPS240 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance--20 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R7 M260XGeForce 820M
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)1.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)5.1

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.