AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

VS
Performance
Radeon R7 M260
1,8972% of 104,598
GeForce 940MX35% better
2,5562% of 104,598

The GeForce 940MX has 35% better performance than the Radeon R7 M260 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M260
No data available
GeForce 940MX
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M260 and the GeForce 940MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R7 M260
Shop GeForce 940MX
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R7 M260 GPU

The AMD Radeon R7 M260 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2014. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Topaz) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R7 M260 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R7 M260 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 940 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 980 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R7 M260 has the 368th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 940MX is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in 2016. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM108) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 940MX has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 40.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 940MX includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 954 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 993 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 23 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 940MX has the 322nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.44% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Maxwell
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 20142016
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Dirt Rally 2.0
Dirt Rally 2.0
Display FPS for Far Cry New Dawn
Far Cry New Dawn
Display FPS for Battlefield V
Battlefield V
Display FPS for Hitman 2
Hitman 2
Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Display FPS for Forza Horizon 4
Forza Horizon 4

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 2020
F1 2020
Radeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
Low - 720p
--
48 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
23 FPS
High - 1080p
--
18 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
11 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260 orGeForce 940MX
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 950M18.5+65%
GeForce MX15016+43%
GeForce MX33016+43%
GeForce MX25016+43%
GeForce MX13012.6+13%
GeForce 940MX11.2
GeForce 930MX9.74-13%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260 orGeForce 940MX
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R7 M260
1,8972% of 104,598
GeForce 940MX35% better
2,5562% of 104,598

The GeForce 940MX has 35% better performance than the Radeon R7 M260 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R7 M260 is ranked 368th with a score of 1,897, and the GeForce 940MX is ranked 322nd with a score of 2,556.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 M260
No data available
GeForce 940MX
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R7 M260 and the GeForce 940MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro M5202,658+40%
Radeon R9 M265X2,633+39%
GeForce 940MX2,556+35%
GeForce GT 750M2,543+34%
Radeon R7 M3702,524+33%
Radeon HD 8770M1,934+2%
Radeon R7 M260X1,903+0%
Radeon R7 M2601,897
Radeon R7 M2651,882-1%
Radeon R7 M2701,857.5-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 M260 orGeForce 940MX
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
626
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
710
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5,603
11,513
(+105.48%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,067
1,996
(+87.07%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,942.5
2,660.5
(+36.96%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
33.8
64.5
(+90.83%)
PassMark G3D Mark
498
1,517
(+204.62%)
PassMark G2D Mark
120
170
(+41.67%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
14.2
25.2
(+77.46%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
11.3
22
(+94.69%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
CodenameTopazGM108
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Maxwell
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,550 million1,020 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
Memory Size2 GB1,024 MB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s40.1 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--23 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
Stream Processors (SP)384--
CUDA Cores--384
Compute Units (CU)6--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2424
Render Output Units (ROP)88
Core Clock Speed940 MHz954 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)980 MHz993 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
Pixel Fill Rate7.84 GPixel/s7.94 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate23.52 GTexel/s23.83 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance752.6 GFLOPS762.6 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance47.04 GFLOPS23.83 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R7 M260GeForce 940MX
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.