Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R7 370
8,518.58% of 104,598
TITAN X (Pascal)323% better
35,99534% of 104,598
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 323% better performance than the Radeon R7 370 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 37090% better
57.1735% of 161.45
TITAN X (Pascal)
30.0219% of 161.45
The Radeon R7 370 has 90% better value for the money than the TITAN X (Pascal) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon R7 370
Shop TITAN X (Pascal)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R7 370 GPU
The AMD Radeon R7 370 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q2 2015 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Trinidad) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R7 370 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,400 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R7 370 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 925 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 975 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R7 370 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 300 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 110 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R7 370 has the 196th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 8,518.5 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 57.17. This is the 59th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) GPU
The NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2016 with a MSRP of $1,199. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP102) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.
Memory
The TITAN X has 12 GB of GDDR5X memory, with a 1,251 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 480.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The TITAN X includes 3,584 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,417 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,531 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The TITAN X occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The TITAN X has the 55th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 34.41% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 35,995 score and $1,199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 30.02. This is the 79th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2015 | Q3 2016 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $149 | $1,199 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Gears Tactics
Doom Eternal
F1 2019
Escape from Tarkov
Fortnite
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Rise of the Tomb Raider
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Gears Tactics | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 52 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 28 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 22 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 370 orTITAN X (Pascal)
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 61.9 | +184% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 51.6 | +137% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 40 | +83% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 32.6 | +50% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 30.7 | +41% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 21.8 | |
| GeForce GT 1030 | 15.4 | -29% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 370 orTITAN X (Pascal)
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 3.55 | -48% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 3.73 | -45% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 4.26 | -38% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 4.44 | -35% |
| GeForce GT 1030 | 5.13 | -25% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 6.83 | |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R7 370
8,518.58% of 104,598
TITAN X (Pascal)323% better
35,99534% of 104,598
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 323% better performance than the Radeon R7 370 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R7 370 is ranked 196th with a score of 8,518.5, and the TITAN X (Pascal) is ranked 55th with a score of 35,995.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 37090% better
57.1735% of 161.45
TITAN X (Pascal)
30.0219% of 161.45
The Radeon R7 370 has 90% better value for the money than the TITAN X (Pascal) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R7 370 is ranked 59th with a performance per dollar of 57.17, and the TITAN X (Pascal) is ranked 79th with a performance per dollar of 30.02.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 370 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 37,671.5 | +342% |
| Arc A750 | 37,288 | +338% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 35,995 | +323% |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 35,822.5 | +321% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 34,963.5 | +310% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 9,166.5 | +8% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 8,571 | +1% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 8,518.5 | |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 8,415 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 8,351 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 370 or
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GT 1030 | 59.84 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 58.2 | +2% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 57.17 | |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 54.11 | -5% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 52.52 | -8% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | -17% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 30.02 | -47% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 1,442 | 9,076 (+529.4%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,606 | 9,417 (+486.36%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 39,808.5 | 135,092 (+239.35%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,961 | 27,315.5 (+358.24%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 104,649 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 8,866 | 30,628 (+245.45%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 122 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,512 | -- |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 599 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Trinidad | GP102 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Transistors | 2,800 million | 11,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 Gb/s | 480.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,400 MHz | 1,251 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 3 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 W | 250 W |
| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 1,024 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 3,584 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 16 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 28 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 224 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 96 |
| Core Clock Speed | 925 MHz | 1,417 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 975 MHz | 1,531 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 31.2 GPixel/s | 147 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 62.4 GTexel/s | 342.9 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2 TFLOPS | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS | 342.9 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R7 370 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.