PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

AMD
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Radeon R7 370
8,518.58% of 104,937
GeForce GTX 1660148% better
21,13120% of 104,937

The GeForce GTX 1660 has 148% better performance than the Radeon R7 370 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 370
57.1735% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 166069% better
96.4960% of 161.45

The GeForce GTX 1660 has 69% better value for the money than the Radeon R7 370 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R7 370
Shop GeForce GTX 1660
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R7 370 GPU

The Radeon R7 370 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2015 with a suggested retail price of $149. Its Trinidad chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 1.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,400 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

The R7 370 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 110 W. AMD recommends using a power supply of at least 300 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

The Radeon R7 370 has the 193rd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 8,518.5 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 57.17. This is the 59th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 GPU

The GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2019 with a suggested retail price of $219. Its TU116 chip that powers the GPU uses the Turing architecture and is fabricated on the 12 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 6 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 2,001 MHz memory clock and 192 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 192.1 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

The GTX 1660 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 120 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 300 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

The GeForce GTX 1660 has the 109th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 20.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 21,131 score and $219 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 96.49. This is the 18th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Turing
Market SegmentDesktopDesktop
Release DateQ2 2015Q1 2019
Launch Price (MSRP)$149$219
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (2023)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (2023)
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
More games to choose from
More Games

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
Low - 1080p
--
67 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
51 FPS
High - 1080p
--
48 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
47 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
33 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
18 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 370 orGeForce GTX 1660
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon RX 570028.8+59%
Radeon RX 5600 XT25.7+42%
Arc A77023+27%
Arc A75021.7+20%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER20.4+13%
GeForce GTX 166018.1
Radeon RX 5500 XT17.9-1%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER14.5-20%
Radeon RX 6500 XT10.5-42%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 370 orGeForce GTX 1660

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R7 370
8,518.58% of 104,937
GeForce GTX 1660148% better
21,13120% of 104,937

The GeForce GTX 1660 has 148% better performance than the Radeon R7 370 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R7 370 is ranked 193rd with a score of 8,518.5, and the GeForce GTX 1660 is ranked 109th with a score of 21,131.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R7 370
57.1735% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 166069% better
96.4960% of 161.45

The GeForce GTX 1660 has 69% better value for the money than the Radeon R7 370 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R7 370 is ranked 59th with a performance per dollar of 57.17, and the GeForce GTX 1660 is ranked 18th with a performance per dollar of 96.49.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 370 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti22,891.5+169%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER21,982+158%
GeForce GTX 166021,131+148%
Radeon RX 5500 XT19,499+129%
Radeon RX 57018,967+123%
GeForce GTX 5909,166.5+8%
GeForce GTX 10508,571+1%
Radeon R7 3708,518.5
GeForce GTX 660 Ti8,415-1%
GeForce GTX 9508,351-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R7 370 or

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,442
5,461.5
(+278.74%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,606
6,013.5
(+274.44%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
39,808.5
80,889
(+103.2%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,961
14,055
(+135.78%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
64,188
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,866
21,492
(+142.41%)
PassMark G3D Mark
4,521
11,690
(+158.57%)
PassMark G2D Mark
606
776
(+28.05%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
CodenameTrinidadTU116
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Turing
Process Size28 nm12 nm
Transistors2,800 million6,600 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
Memory Size2 GB6 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth179.2 Gb/s192.1 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,400 MHz2,001 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit192 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1,536 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
Slots2 slots2 slots
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)110 W120 W
Suggested PSU300 W300 W
Power Connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin
OutputsDVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
Stream Processors (SP)1,024--
CUDA Cores--1,408
Compute Units (CU)16--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--22
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6488
Render Output Units (ROP)3248
Core Clock Speed925 MHz1,530 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)975 MHz1,785 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
Pixel Fill Rate31.2 GPixel/s85.68 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate62.4 GTexel/s157.1 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2 TFLOPS5.03 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance124.8 GFLOPS157.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 1660
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.