AMD Radeon R5 M320 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

VS
Performance
Radeon R5 M320
1,6522% of 104,598
Quadro K3000M47% better
2,4272% of 104,598

The Quadro K3000M has 47% better performance than the Radeon R5 M320 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M320
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M320 and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R5 M320
Shop Quadro K3000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R5 M320 GPU

The AMD Radeon R5 M320 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jet) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R5 M320 has 4 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 16 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R5 M320 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 780 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 855 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R5 M320 has the 399th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro K3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The K3000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 89.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The K3000M includes 576 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 654 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 654 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The K3000M has the 330th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q2 2012
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Radeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
Low - 720p
40 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
27 FPS
--
High - 768p
23 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M320 orQuadro K3000M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon R5 M25527.21+19%
GeForce 820M26+14%
GeForce 910M25.8+13%
GeForce 710M25+9%
GeForce GT 720M24+5%
Radeon R5 M32022.9
Radeon R5 M33022-4%
Radeon R5 M24021.6-6%
Radeon R5 M33521.4-7%
Radeon R5 M43021-8%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M320 orQuadro K3000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R5 M320
1,6522% of 104,598
Quadro K3000M47% better
2,4272% of 104,598

The Quadro K3000M has 47% better performance than the Radeon R5 M320 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R5 M320 is ranked 399th with a score of 1,652, and the Quadro K3000M is ranked 330th with a score of 2,427.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M320
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M320 and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M320 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 6950M2,452+48%
Quadro K620M2,434+47%
Quadro K3000M2,427+47%
FirePro M60002,422+47%
GeForce 940M2,405.5+46%
Radeon R5 M3301,689+2%
Radeon R5 M4301,689+2%
Radeon R5 M3201,652
GeForce GTX 460M1,623-2%
Radeon HD 8690M1,600-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M320 orQuadro K3000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
4,969
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,660
2,767
(+66.69%)
PassMark G3D Mark
455
1,638
(+260%)
PassMark G2D Mark
141
340
(+141.13%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
CodenameJetGK104
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors690 million3,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth16 Gb/s89.6 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz700 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
Stream Processors (SP)320--
CUDA Cores--576
Compute Units (CU)5--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--3
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2048
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Core Clock Speed780 MHz654 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)855 MHz654 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
Pixel Fill Rate6.84 GPixel/s7.85 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate17.1 GTexel/s31.39 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance547.2 GFLOPS753.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance34.2 GFLOPS31.39 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Quadro K3000M
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.