AMD Radeon R5 M320 vs Intel Arc A350M

VS
Performance
Radeon R5 M320
1,6522% of 104,598
Arc A350M550% better
10,73010% of 104,598

The Arc A350M has 550% better performance than the Radeon R5 M320 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M320
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M320 and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R5 M320
Shop Arc A350M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R5 M320 GPU

The AMD Radeon R5 M320 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jet) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R5 M320 has 4 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 16 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R5 M320 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 780 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 855 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R5 M320 has the 399th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Arc A350M GPU

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A350M includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,150 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 6 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A350M has the 173rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R5 M320Arc A350M
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Generation 12.7
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015Q1 2022
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Display FPS for Hogwarts Legacy
Hogwarts Legacy
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (4.0)
The Witcher 3 (4.0)
Display FPS for High On Life
High On Life
Display FPS for The Callisto Protocol
The Callisto Protocol
Display FPS for Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Spider-man: Miles Morales
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Radeon R5 M320Arc A350M
Low - 720p
--
60 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
32 FPS
High - 1080p
--
25 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
21 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
12 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
7 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M320 orArc A350M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile12+71%
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile8+14%
Arc A350M7

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M320 orArc A350M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R5 M320
1,6522% of 104,598
Arc A350M550% better
10,73010% of 104,598

The Arc A350M has 550% better performance than the Radeon R5 M320 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R5 M320 is ranked 399th with a score of 1,652, and the Arc A350M is ranked 173rd with a score of 10,730.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M320
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M320 and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M320 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+571%
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+555%
Arc A350M10,730+550%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+540%
T600 Mobile10,498+535%
Radeon R5 M3301,689+2%
Radeon R5 M4301,689+2%
Radeon R5 M3201,652
GeForce GTX 460M1,623-2%
Radeon HD 8690M1,600-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M320 orArc A350M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R5 M320Arc A350M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
3,050
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
3,397
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
4,969
36,314.5
(+630.82%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
7,147
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,660
10,766
(+548.55%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
149.3
PassMark G3D Mark
455
--
PassMark G2D Mark
141
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Arc A350M
CodenameJetDG2-128
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Generation 12.7
Process Size28 nm6 nm
Transistors690 million7,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Arc A350M
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth16 Gb/s112 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz1,750 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Arc A350M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--25 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Arc A350M
Stream Processors (SP)320--
Shading Units--768
Compute Units (CU)5--
Execution Units (EU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2048
Render Output Units (ROP)824
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--96
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--6
Core Clock Speed780 MHz1,150 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)855 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Arc A350M
Pixel Fill Rate6.84 GPixel/s52.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate17.1 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance547.2 GFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance34.2 GFLOPS844.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R5 M320Arc A350M
DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.