AMD Radeon R5 M320 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon R5 M320 has 2% of the performance compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M320 and the Radeon HD 5750 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
AMD Radeon R5 M320 GPU
The Radeon R5 M320 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2015. Its Jet chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 1.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of DDR3 VRAM. Its 1,000 MHz memory clock and 64 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 16 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The Radeon R5 M320 has the 396th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
ATI Radeon HD 5750 GPU
The Radeon HD 5750 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by ATI. It launched in Q4 2009. Its Juniper chip that powers the GPU uses the TeraScale 2 architecture and is fabricated on the 40 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 1,024 MB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,150 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 73.6 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The HD 5750 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.3a, DisplayPort 1.1 display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 86 W. ATI recommends using a power supply of at least 250 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
General Info
General overview of the GPUs, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | ATI |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2015 | Q4 2009 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
Gaming performance benchmarks based on their average frame rate (FPS) in popular games. These provide a strong indicator of a GPU's ability to handle demanding titles and help assess its value for the money.
- Frames Per Second
BioShock Infinite | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 40 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 27 FPS | -- |
| High - 768p | 23 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
Compare the average frame rate (FPS) in with similar GPUs. Higher FPS leads to smoother gaming experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R5 M255 | 27.21 | +19% |
| GeForce 820M | 26 | +14% |
| GeForce 910M | 25.8 | +13% |
| GeForce 710M | 25 | +9% |
| GeForce GT 720M | 24 | +5% |
| Radeon R5 M320 | 22.9 | |
| Radeon R5 M330 | 22 | -4% |
| Radeon R5 M240 | 21.6 | -6% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 21.4 | -7% |
| Radeon R5 M430 | 21 | -8% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
Compare the average cost per frame in with similar GPUs. A lower cost per frame translates to more performance for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon R5 M320 has 2% of the performance compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon R5 M320's 1,652 performance score ranks it 396th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M320 and the Radeon HD 5750 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
Compare the average benchmark score with similar GPUs. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce 920M | 1,718.5 | +4% |
| GeForce GT 735M | 1,713 | +4% |
| Radeon HD 8750M | 1,698 | +3% |
| Radeon R5 M330 | 1,689 | +2% |
| Radeon R5 M430 | 1,689 | +2% |
| Radeon R5 M320 | 1,652 | |
| GeForce GTX 460M | 1,623 | -2% |
| Radeon HD 8690M | 1,600 | -3% |
| Radeon R5 M240 | 1,588 | -4% |
| Quadro 3000M | 1,539 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
Compare the performance per dollar with similar GPUs. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
Performance metrics across industry-standard GPU benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 4,969 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,660 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 444 | 1,162 (+161.71%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 141 | 339 (+140.43%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Jet | Juniper |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 690 million | 1,040 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 1,024 MB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gb/s | 73.6 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 1,150 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 86 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 6-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 1.3a, DisplayPort 1.1 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like their cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 320 | -- |
| Shading Units | -- | 720 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 5 | 9 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 20 | 36 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 780 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 855 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.84 GPixel/s | 11.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 17.1 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 547.2 GFLOPS | 1,008 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 34.2 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 5.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.