Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R5 M255
1,7842% of 104,598
Radeon R7 M2606% better
1,8972% of 104,598
The Radeon R7 M260 has 6% better performance than the Radeon R5 M255 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M255
No data available
Radeon R7 M260
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M255 and the Radeon R7 M260 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon R5 M255
Shop Radeon R7 M260
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R5 M255 GPU
The AMD Radeon R5 M255 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2014. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Topaz) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R5 M255 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 32 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R5 M255 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 925 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 940 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R5 M255 has the 380th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.71% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R7 M260 GPU
The AMD Radeon R7 M260 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2014. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Topaz) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R7 M260 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R7 M260 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 940 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 980 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R7 M260 has the 368th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q4 2014 | Q2 2014 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
Ready or Not
EA Sports WRC
Total War: PHARAOH
Counter-Strike 2
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Lies of P
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 7 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M255 orRadeon R7 M260
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs. | ||
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M255 orRadeon R7 M260
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R5 M255
1,7842% of 104,598
Radeon R7 M2606% better
1,8972% of 104,598
The Radeon R7 M260 has 6% better performance than the Radeon R5 M255 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R5 M255 is ranked 380th with a score of 1,784, and the Radeon R7 M260 is ranked 368th with a score of 1,897.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M255
No data available
Radeon R7 M260
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M255 and the Radeon R7 M260 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M255 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8770M | 1,934 | +8% |
| Radeon R7 M260X | 1,903 | +7% |
| Radeon R7 M260 | 1,897 | +6% |
| Radeon R7 M265 | 1,882 | +5% |
| Radeon R7 M270 | 1,857.5 | +4% |
| GeForce GTX 560M | 1,820 | +2% |
| Quadro K2000M | 1,798 | +1% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 1,784 | 0% |
| Radeon R5 M255 | 1,784 | |
| GeForce 825M | 1,756.5 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M255 orRadeon R7 M260
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 6,053 (+8.03%) | 5,603 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,080.5 (+1.27%) | 1,067 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,907 | 1,942.5 (+1.86%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 34.7 (+2.66%) | 33.8 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 534 (+7.23%) | 498 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 135 (+12.5%) | 120 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 14.2 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 11.3 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Topaz | Topaz |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1,550 million | 1,550 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 32 Gb/s | 14.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 384 | 384 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | 6 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 925 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 940 MHz | 980 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 7.52 GPixel/s | 7.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 22.56 GTexel/s | 23.52 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 721.9 GFLOPS | 752.6 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 45.12 GFLOPS | 47.04 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M255 | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.