Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R5 M240
1,5882% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M224% better
5,1435% of 104,598
The Quadro M2000M has 224% better performance than the Radeon R5 M240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M240
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M240 and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon R5 M240
Shop Quadro M2000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R5 M240 GPU
The AMD Radeon R5 M240 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jet) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R5 M240 has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R5 M240 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,030 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R5 M240 has the 403rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The M2000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The M2000M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,098 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,137 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The M2000M has the 247th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2014 | Q4 2015 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Rise of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
GTA V
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | -- | 72 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 46 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 22 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | 11 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M240 orQuadro M2000M
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 18.3 | +66% |
| GeForce GTX 880M | 14.6 | +33% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 12.9 | +17% |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 11.9 | +8% |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 11.3 | +3% |
| Quadro M2000M | 11 | |
| GeForce GTX 960M | 9 | -18% |
| GeForce GTX 860M | 7.9 | -28% |
| GeForce MX150 | 7 | -36% |
| GeForce GTX 850M | 6.9 | -37% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M240 orQuadro M2000M
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R5 M240
1,5882% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M224% better
5,1435% of 104,598
The Quadro M2000M has 224% better performance than the Radeon R5 M240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R5 M240 is ranked 403rd with a score of 1,588, and the Quadro M2000M is ranked 247th with a score of 5,143.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M240
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M240 and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M240 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 960M | 5,278 | +232% |
| Radeon Pro 555 | 5,185 | +227% |
| Quadro M2000M | 5,143 | +224% |
| Quadro K4100M | 4,957 | +212% |
| GeForce GTX 860M | 4,902 | +209% |
| GeForce GTX 460M | 1,623 | +2% |
| Radeon HD 8690M | 1,600 | +1% |
| Radeon R5 M240 | 1,588 | |
| Quadro 3000M | 1,539 | -3% |
| Radeon HD 7730M | 1,478 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M240 orQuadro M2000M
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 5,500 | 29,795 (+441.73%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 949 | 4,157 (+338.04%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,669 | 5,456 (+226.9%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 26.9 | 92.7 (+244.61%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 450 | 3,458 (+668.44%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 158 | 342 (+116.46%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 52.7 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 42.1 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Jet | GM107 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 690 million | 1,870 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 14.4 Gb/s | 80.19 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 1,253 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 55 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 320 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 640 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 5 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 20 | 40 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,098 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,030 MHz | 1,137 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 8.24 GPixel/s | 18.19 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 20.6 GTexel/s | 45.48 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 659.2 GFLOPS | 1,455 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 41.2 GFLOPS | 45.48 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R5 M240 | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.