AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT

VS
Performance
Radeon R5 M240
1,5882% of 104,598
Radeon RX 7600M XT2,243% better
37,20236% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 7600M XT has 2,243% better performance than the Radeon R5 M240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M240
No data available
Radeon RX 7600M XT
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M240 and the Radeon RX 7600M XT for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R5 M240
Shop Radeon RX 7600M XT
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R5 M240 GPU

The AMD Radeon R5 M240 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jet) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R5 M240 has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R5 M240 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,030 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R5 M240 has the 403rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT GPU

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 33) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX 7600M XT includes 2,048 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,280 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,469 MHz. It usually operates at 2,023 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 32 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 120 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX 7600M XT has the 50th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 35.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 1.0RDNA 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2014Q1 2023
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Black Myth: Wukong
Black Myth: Wukong
Display FPS for Once Human
Once Human
Display FPS for The First Descendant
The First Descendant
Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Black Myth: Wukong
Black Myth: Wukong
Radeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
Low - 1080p
--
87 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
62 FPS
High - 1080p
--
47 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
25 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
18 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
6 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M240 orRadeon RX 7600M XT

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M240 orRadeon RX 7600M XT
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R5 M240
1,5882% of 104,598
Radeon RX 7600M XT2,243% better
37,20236% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 7600M XT has 2,243% better performance than the Radeon R5 M240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R5 M240 is ranked 403rd with a score of 1,588, and the Radeon RX 7600M XT is ranked 50th with a score of 37,202.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R5 M240
No data available
Radeon RX 7600M XT
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 M240 and the Radeon RX 7600M XT for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M240 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon RX 7700S37,918+2,288%
Arc A770M37,375+2,254%
Radeon RX 7600M XT37,202+2,243%
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile36,969.5+2,228%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile36,185+2,179%
GeForce GTX 460M1,623+2%
Radeon HD 8690M1,600+1%
Radeon R5 M2401,588
Quadro 3000M1,539-3%
Radeon HD 7730M1,478-7%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R5 M240 orRadeon RX 7600M XT
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
9,526.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
9,804
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5,500
152,903
(+2,680.05%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
949
28,271
(+2,879.03%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
106,442
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,669
29,601.5
(+1,673.61%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
26.9
227.5
(+745.72%)
PassMark G3D Mark
450
13,018
(+2,792.89%)
PassMark G2D Mark
158
778
(+392.41%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
CodenameJetNavi 33
ArchitectureGCN 1.0RDNA 3.0
Process Size28 nm6 nm
Transistors690 million13,300 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
Memory Size1,024 MB8 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s288 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz2,250 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB128 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--120 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
Stream Processors (SP)3202,048
Compute Units (CU)532
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)20128
Render Output Units (ROP)864
Ray Accelerators--32
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz1,280 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,030 MHz2,469 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Game)--2,023 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
Pixel Fill Rate8.24 GPixel/s158 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate20.6 GTexel/s316 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance659.2 GFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance41.2 GFLOPS632.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R5 M240Radeon RX 7600M XT
DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)2.2
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.