AMD Radeon R5 (Beema) vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 211% better performance than the Radeon R5 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 (Beema) and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon R5 (Beema) GPU
The Radeon R5 (Beema) is an graphics card by AMD. It is built on the GCN 1.1 GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R5 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks.
Benchmark Performance
The R5 has the 482nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2017. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has the 334th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R5 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | -- | Q1 2017 |
| Production Status | -- | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 211% better performance than the Radeon R5 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R5 (Beema) is ranked 482nd with a score of 764, and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 is ranked 334th with a score of 2,379.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R5 (Beema) and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | 2,551 | +234% |
| Iris Graphics 550 | 2,533.5 | +232% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 2,379 | +211% |
| Iris Graphics 540 | 2,211.5 | +189% |
| Radeon R6 M255DX | 2,198 | +188% |
| Radeon HD 8470D | 854 | +12% |
| HD Graphics 510 | 847 | +11% |
| Radeon R5 (Beema) | 764 | |
| HD Graphics 4400 | 735.5 | -4% |
| Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | 730.5 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R5 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 437 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 494.5 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 3,317 | 11,248 (+239.1%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 539 | 1,393.5 (+158.53%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 831 | 2,561 (+208.18%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 17 | 56.2 (+230.59%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 1,343 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 341 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R5 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | -- | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R5 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | -- | System Shared |
| Memory Type | -- | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | -- | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | -- | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R5 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | -- | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 15 W |
| Outputs | -- | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R5 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 128 | -- |
| Shading Units | -- | 384 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | -- | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | -- | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | -- | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 850 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R5 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | -- | 6.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | -- | 52.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | -- | 844.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 211.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R5 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | -- | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | -- | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | -- | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.