AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) has 485% better performance than the Radeon R4 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R4 (Beema) and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) GPU
The AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2014. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Beema) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R4 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 800 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The R4 has the 489th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) GPU
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2020. It is built on the Generation 11.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Ice Lake GT2) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 includes 512 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 has the 271st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2014 | Q2 2020 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | 12 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 7 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs. | ||
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) has 485% better performance than the Radeon R4 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R4 (Beema) is ranked 489th with a score of 716, and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) is ranked 271st with a score of 4,187.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R4 (Beema) and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics (Alder Lake, 64EU) | 4,832.5 | +575% |
| Radeon RX Vega 9 | 4,380 | +512% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) | 4,187 | +485% |
| Radeon R8 M445DX | 3,775 | +427% |
| Radeon RX Vega 5 | 3,535 | +394% |
| Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | 730.5 | +2% |
| Radeon HD 8450G | 724 | +1% |
| Radeon R4 (Beema) | 716 | |
| Radeon HD 7640G | 655.5 | -8% |
| Radeon HD 6620G | 650 | -9% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 791 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 892 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 3,309 | 16,713 (+405.08%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 497 | 2,717.5 (+446.78%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 9,230 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 788 | 4,436 (+462.94%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 16 | 65.2 (+307.5%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 336 | -- |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 98 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Beema | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Transistors | 930 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | IGP | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 128 | -- |
| Shading Units | -- | 512 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 2 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 8 | 32 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 4 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 800 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,050 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 3.2 GPixel/s | 8.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 6.4 GTexel/s | 33.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 204.8 GFLOPS | 1,075 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 12.8 GFLOPS | 268.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R4 (Beema) | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.