Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R3 (Beema)
6201% of 104,598
Iris Pro Graphics 6200346% better
2,7663% of 104,598
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 346% better performance than the Radeon R3 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R3 (Beema)
No data available
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R3 (Beema) and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon R3 (Beema)
Shop Iris Pro Graphics 6200
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R3 (Beema) GPU
The AMD Radeon R3 (Beema) is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Beema) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R3 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 686 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The R3 has the 501st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.59% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the Generation 8.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Broadwell GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has the 313th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q1 2015 | Q3 2014 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
BioShock Infinite
CS: GO
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
BioShock Infinite | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 31 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 16 FPS | -- |
| High - 768p | 13 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R3 (Beema) orIris Pro Graphics 6200
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7480D | 17.4 | +31% |
| Radeon R4 (Beema) | 14 | +5% |
| Radeon R5 (Kaveri) | 13.9 | +5% |
| Radeon HD 8450G | 13.4 | +1% |
| Radeon R3 (Beema) | 13.3 | |
| Radeon HD 8610G | 10.9 | -18% |
| Radeon HD 8330 | 10 | -25% |
| Radeon HD 7400G | 9 | -32% |
| Radeon R2 (Beema) | 8.9 | -33% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R3 (Beema) orIris Pro Graphics 6200
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R3 (Beema)
6201% of 104,598
Iris Pro Graphics 6200346% better
2,7663% of 104,598
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 346% better performance than the Radeon R3 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R3 (Beema) is ranked 501st with a score of 620, and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is ranked 313th with a score of 2,766.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R3 (Beema)
No data available
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R3 (Beema) and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R3 (Beema) or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | +367% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | +362% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | +346% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 2,762 | +345% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 2,681 | +332% |
| Radeon HD 7600G | 628 | +1% |
| Radeon HD 8350G | 624 | +1% |
| Radeon R3 (Beema) | 620 | |
| HD Graphics 505 | 620 | 0% |
| Radeon HD 8400 | 614 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R3 (Beema) orIris Pro Graphics 6200
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 3,049 | 15,387.5 (+404.67%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 419.5 | 1,736.5 (+313.95%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 686 | 3,094 (+351.02%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 14.4 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 307 | 1,471 (+379.15%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 94 | 574 (+510.64%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Beema | Broadwell GT3e |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 930 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | IGP | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 128 | -- |
| Shading Units | -- | 384 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 2 | -- |
| Execution Units (EU) | -- | 48 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 8 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 4 | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 686 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 1.4 GPixel/s | 6.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 2.81 GTexel/s | 52.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 89.86 GFLOPS | 844.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 5.62 GFLOPS | 211.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R3 (Beema) | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.