AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) vs AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
The Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) has 2% better performance than the Radeon R4 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and the Radeon R4 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) GPU
The Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is an end-of-life integrated graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2016. Its Stoney chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
This GPU is paired with System Shared of VRAM. Its System Shared memory clock and System Shared interface gives it a bandwidth of System Dependent. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) has the 484th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.70% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) GPU
The Radeon R4 (Beema) is an end-of-life integrated graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2014. Its Beema chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The Radeon R4 (Beema) has the 486th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2016 | Q2 2014 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | -- | 12 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 7 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs. | ||
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) has 2% better performance than the Radeon R4 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is ranked 484th with a score of 730.5, and the Radeon R4 (Beema) is ranked 486th with a score of 716.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and the Radeon R4 (Beema) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8470D | 854 | +17% |
| HD Graphics 510 | 847 | +16% |
| Radeon R5 (Beema) | 764 | +5% |
| HD Graphics 4400 | 735.5 | +1% |
| Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | 730.5 | |
| Radeon HD 8450G | 724 | -1% |
| Radeon R4 (Beema) | 716 | -2% |
| Radeon HD 7640G | 655.5 | -10% |
| Radeon HD 6620G | 650 | -11% |
| UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake, 16EU) | 650 | -11% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 3,321.5 (+0.38%) | 3,309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 511.5 (+2.92%) | 497 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 774.5 | 788 (+1.74%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 15.1 | 16 (+5.96%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 240 | 335 (+39.58%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 68 | 99 (+45.59%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 7.7 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 5.5 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Stoney | Beema |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1,200 million | 930 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | IGP | IGP |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 128 | 128 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 2 | 2 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 8 | 8 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 4 | 4 |
| Core Clock Speed | 200 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 600 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 2.4 GPixel/s | 3.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 4.8 GTexel/s | 6.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 153.6 GFLOPS | 204.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 9.6 GFLOPS | 12.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Radeon R4 (Beema) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.