PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)

AMD
VS
Intel
Performance
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL506% better
10,02010% of 104,737
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
1,6542% of 104,737

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 506% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Shop UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro WX Vega M GL has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro WX Vega M GL includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 931 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,011 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro WX Vega M GL has the 179th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) GPU

The Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in 2021. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tiger Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Memory

The UHD Graphics Xe has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The UHD Graphics Xe includes 128 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,450 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The UHD Graphics Xe has the 398th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Generation 12.1
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ2 20182021
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Display FPS for Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
Low - 720p
44 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
33 FPS
--
High - 1080p
27 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
17 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
10 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon RX Vega M GL11+10%
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL10
Radeon RX Vega 115-50%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL506% better
10,02010% of 104,737
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
1,6542% of 104,737

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 506% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is ranked 179th with a score of 10,020, and the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) is ranked 398th with a score of 1,654.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,062
(+492.53%)
348
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,213
(+447.77%)
404
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
38,986
(+388.42%)
7,982
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7,333
(+509.56%)
1,203
3DMark 11 Performance Score
9,731
(+403.41%)
1,933
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
132.5
(+186.18%)
46.3
PassMark G3D Mark
4,643
--
PassMark G2D Mark
402
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
CodenamePolaris 22Tiger Lake GT1
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Generation 12.1
Process Size14 nm10 nm
Transistors5,000 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeHBM2System Shared
Memory Bandwidth179.2 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface1,024 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache1,024 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
Bus InterfaceIGPRing Bus
Thermal Design Power (TDP)65 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
Stream Processors (SP)1,280--
Shading Units--128
Compute Units (CU)20--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)808
Render Output Units (ROP)324
Core Clock Speed931 MHz350 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,011 MHz1,450 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
Pixel Fill Rate32.35 GPixel/s5.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate80.88 GTexel/s11.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.59 TFLOPS371.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance161.8 GFLOPS92.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.