PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

AMD
VS
Intel
Performance
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL54% better
10,02010% of 104,937
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
6,523.56% of 104,937

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 54% better performance than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Shop Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL GPU

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2018. Its Polaris 22 chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 4.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 4 GB of HBM2 VRAM. Its 700 MHz memory clock and 1,024 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This integrated card has a TDP of 65 W.

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has the 176th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.55% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) GPU

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q3 2020. Its Tiger Lake GT2 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.1 architecture and is fabricated on the 10 nm process.

This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) has the 222nd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Generation 12.1
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ2 2018Q3 2020
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
More games to choose from
More Games

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Low - 1080p
--
40 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
35 FPS
High - 1080p
--
26 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
20 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)20.4
Radeon 780M14.5-29%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL54% better
10,02010% of 104,937
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
6,523.56% of 104,937

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 54% better performance than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is ranked 176th with a score of 10,020, and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) is ranked 222nd with a score of 6,523.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,062
(+32.22%)
1,559.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,213
(+27.48%)
1,736
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
38,986
(+44.77%)
26,929.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7,333
(+42.69%)
5,139
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
19,106
3DMark 11 Performance Score
9,731
(+41.58%)
6,873
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
132.5
(+35.2%)
98
PassMark G3D Mark
4,643
(+73.05%)
2,683
PassMark G2D Mark
400
(+11.73%)
358
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
CodenamePolaris 22Tiger Lake GT2
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Generation 12.1
Process Size14 nm10 nm
Transistors5,000 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeHBM2System Shared
Memory Bandwidth179.2 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface1,024 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache1,024 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Bus InterfaceIGPRing Bus
Thermal Design Power (TDP)65 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Stream Processors (SP)1,280--
Shading Units--768
Compute Units (CU)20--
Execution Units (EU)--96
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8048
Render Output Units (ROP)3224
Core Clock Speed931 MHz300 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,011 MHz1,100 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Pixel Fill Rate32.35 GPixel/s26.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate80.88 GTexel/s52.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.59 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance161.8 GFLOPS422.4 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.