Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL321% better
10,02010% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2,3792% of 104,598
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 321% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Shop Iris Plus Graphics 640
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro WX Vega M GL has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro WX Vega M GL includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 931 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,011 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Pro WX Vega M GL has the 179th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2017. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has the 335th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2018 | Q1 2017 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rocket League
The Witcher 3
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 44 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 33 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 27 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 17 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 10 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orIris Plus Graphics 640
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega M GL | 11 | +10% |
| Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | 10 | |
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | 5 | -50% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orIris Plus Graphics 640
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL321% better
10,02010% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2,3792% of 104,598
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 321% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is ranked 179th with a score of 10,020, and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 is ranked 335th with a score of 2,379.
Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega M GH | 14,302 | +43% |
| Radeon 780M | 12,785 | +28% |
| Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | 10,020 | |
| Radeon RX Vega M GL | 9,862 | -2% |
| Radeon 760M | 9,603 | -4% |
| UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | 2,551 | -75% |
| Iris Graphics 550 | 2,533.5 | -75% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 2,379 | -76% |
| Iris Graphics 540 | 2,211.5 | -78% |
| Radeon R6 M255DX | 2,198 | -78% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL orIris Plus Graphics 640
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 2,062 (+371.85%) | 437 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2,213 (+347.52%) | 494.5 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 38,986 (+246.6%) | 11,248 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 7,333 (+426.23%) | 1,393.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 9,731 (+279.97%) | 2,561 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 132.5 (+135.77%) | 56.2 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,643 (+245.72%) | 1,343 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 406 (+19.06%) | 341 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Polaris 22 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 5,000 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | System Shared |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 Gb/s | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | 700 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | 1,024 bit | System Shared |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | IGP | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 1,280 | -- |
| Shading Units | -- | 384 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 20 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 80 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 931 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,011 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | 6.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | 52.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.59 TFLOPS | 844.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | 211.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.