Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3200
4,337.54% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 105098% better
8,5718% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1050 has 98% better performance than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro WX 3200
21.814% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 1050261% better
78.6349% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 1050 has 261% better value for the money than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon Pro WX 3200
Shop GeForce GTX 1050
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q3 2019 with a MSRP of $199. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 23) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro WX 3200 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,295 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The Pro WX 3200 is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Pro WX 3200 has the 267th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.15% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 4,337.5 score and $199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 21.8. This is the 84th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2016 with a MSRP of $109. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1050 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1050 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,455 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1050 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1050 has the 195th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.19% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 8,571 score and $109 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 78.63. This is the 37th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q3 2019 | Q4 2016 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $199 | $109 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Black Myth: Wukong
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
EA Sports F1 22
Dying Light 2
God of War
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Flight Simulator 2020
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Black Myth: Wukong | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 8 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 5 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX 3200 orGeForce GTX 1050
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 22 | +340% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 15 | +200% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 5 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX 3200 orGeForce GTX 1050
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 9.95 | -54% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 10.6 | -51% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 21.8 | |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3200
4,337.54% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 105098% better
8,5718% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1050 has 98% better performance than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is ranked 267th with a score of 4,337.5, and the GeForce GTX 1050 is ranked 195th with a score of 8,571.
Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro WX 3200
21.814% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 1050261% better
78.6349% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 1050 has 261% better value for the money than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is ranked 84th with a performance per dollar of 21.8, and the GeForce GTX 1050 is ranked 37th with a performance per dollar of 78.63.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX 3200 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 19,978 | +361% |
| Quadro P4000 | 15,433 | +256% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 9,453 | +118% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 9,166.5 | +111% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 8,571 | +98% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 8,518.5 | +96% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 8,415 | +94% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 4,337.5 | |
| Radeon Pro WX 3100 | 3,690.5 | -15% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro WX 3200 or
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 96.18 | +341% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 91.58 | +320% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 78.63 | +261% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 78.25 | +259% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 68.01 | +212% |
| RTX A2000 | 44.49 | +104% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 44.49 | +104% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 21.8 | |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 19.74 | -9% |
| Quadro P4000 | 18.94 | -13% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 955.5 | 1,797 (+88.07%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,059 | 1,984 (+87.35%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 18,866 | 40,922 (+116.91%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 3,156 | 6,797 (+115.37%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 4,657 | 8,817 (+89.33%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 76.5 | 132 (+72.55%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 2,438 | 5,039 (+106.69%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 417 | 456 (+9.35%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 88.3 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Polaris 23 | GP107 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 2,200 million | 3,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 Gb/s | 112.1 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,500 MHz | 1,752 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 1 slot | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 250 W |
| Outputs | mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 640 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 640 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 10 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 5 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 32 | 40 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,295 MHz | 1,354 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,455 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 20.72 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 41.44 GTexel/s | 58.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1.66 TFLOPS | 1.86 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 103.6 GFLOPS | 58.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.