AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 205% better performance than the Quadro P2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and the Quadro P2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 GPU
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a workstation graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q3 2017. Its Vega 10 chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 5.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 8 GB of HBM2 VRAM. Its 786 MHz memory clock and 2,048 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 402.4 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This workstation card has a TDP of 210 W.
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 has the 92nd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 24.39% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 GPU
The Quadro P2000 is an end-of-life workstation graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2017. Its GP106 chip that powers the GPU uses the Pascal architecture and is fabricated on the 16 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 5 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,752 MHz memory clock and 160 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 140.2 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The P2000 is a compact, low-profile graphics card, taking up 1 PCIe slot. It supports DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This workstation card has a TDP of 75 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 250 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The Quadro P2000 has the 195th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release Date | Q3 2017 | Q1 2017 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Kingdom Come: Deliverance | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 104 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 42 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 33 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 14 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 7 FPS |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs. | ||
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 205% better performance than the Quadro P2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is ranked 92nd with a score of 25,589, and the Quadro P2000 is ranked 195th with a score of 8,387.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and the Quadro P2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 6000 Ada Generation | 70,850 | +177% |
| RTX A6000 | 50,957 | +99% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 44,404 | +74% |
| Radeon Pro Vega 56 | 25,589 | |
| Quadro P5000 | 20,096 | -21% |
| Quadro P4000 | 15,433 | -40% |
| T600 | 8,694 | -66% |
| Quadro P2000 | 8,387 | -67% |
| Quadro P1000 | 6,001 | -77% |
| Quadro P620 | 5,909 | -77% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 5,465 (+167.11%) | 2,046 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5,831 (+158.12%) | 2,259 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 43,565.5 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 17,797 (+159.92%) | 6,847 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 20,785 (+138.94%) | 8,699 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 129.1 | 180.9 (+40.12%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 12,354 (+78.35%) | 6,927 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 839 (+32.13%) | 635 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Vega 10 | GP106 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Transistors | 12,500 million | 4,400 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 402.4 Gb/s | 140.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 786 MHz | 1,752 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 2,048 bit | 160 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 1,280 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 1 slot |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a | DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 3,584 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 1,024 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 56 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 8 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 224 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 40 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,138 MHz | 1,076 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,250 MHz | 1,480 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 80 GPixel/s | 59.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 280 GTexel/s | 94.72 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 8.96 TFLOPS | 3.03 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 560 GFLOPS | 94.72 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.