PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon 680M

AMD
VS
AMD
Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 56146% better
25,58920% of 129,772
Radeon 680M
10,3998% of 129,772

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 146% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro Vega 56
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro Vega 56
Shop Radeon 680M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q3 2017. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 10) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro Vega 56 has 8 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 786 MHz memory clock and a 2,048 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 402.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro Vega 56 includes 3,584 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,138 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,250 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 210 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro Vega 56 has the 109th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 19.72% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU

The AMD Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 680M includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 12 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 680M has the 198th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.01% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 5.0RDNA 2.0
Market SegmentWorkstationMobile
Release DateQ3 2017Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
Low - 1080p
--
62 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
54 FPS
High - 1080p
--
39 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
8 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 56 orRadeon 680M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon RX 7600S39+388%
Radeon RX 7600M XT29+263%
GeForce MX45013.4+68%
RTX A500 Mobile11.7+46%
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile10+25%
Radeon 680M8
Radeon 660M5.6-30%
GeForce MX5704.3-46%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 56 orRadeon 680M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 56146% better
25,58920% of 129,772
Radeon 680M
10,3998% of 129,772

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 146% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is ranked 109th with a score of 25,589, and the Radeon 680M is ranked 198th with a score of 10,399.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro Vega 56
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 56 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
RTX A600050,957+99%
Radeon PRO W680044,404+74%
Radeon Pro Vega 5625,589
Quadro P500020,096-21%
RTX A200019,978-22%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569-59%
T600 Mobile10,498-59%
Radeon 680M10,399-59%
Quadro M4000M10,259-60%
GeForce MX55010,005-61%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 56 orRadeon 680M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5,465
(+137.3%)
2,303
3DMark Time Spy Score
5,831
(+126.01%)
2,580
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
43,225
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
17,797
(+159.24%)
6,865
3DMark 11 Performance Score
20,785
(+100.3%)
10,377
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
129.1
142
(+9.99%)
PassMark G3D Mark
12,354
(+168.97%)
4,593
PassMark G2D Mark
832
(+3.74%)
802
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
CodenameVega 10Rembrandt
ArchitectureGCN 5.0RDNA 2.0
Process Size14 nm6 nm
Transistors12,500 million13,100 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
Memory Size8 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeHBM2System Shared
Memory Bandwidth402.4 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock786 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface2,048 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache16 KB128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)210 W50 W
OutputsHDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4aDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
Stream Processors (SP)3,584768
Compute Units (CU)5612
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)22448
Render Output Units (ROP)6432
Ray Accelerators--12
Core Clock Speed1,138 MHz2,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,250 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
Pixel Fill Rate80 GPixel/s70.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate280 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.96 TFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance560 GFLOPS211.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon 680M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.12.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.