Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 20
12,28912% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 98043% better
17,604.517% of 104,737
The GeForce GTX 980 has 43% better performance than the Radeon Pro Vega 20 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro Vega 20
No data available
GeForce GTX 980
32.0720% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 980 has 20% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon Pro Vega 20
Shop GeForce GTX 980
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2018. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 12) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro Vega 20 has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 740 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 189.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro Vega 20 includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 815 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,283 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Pro Vega 20 has the 158th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2014 with a MSRP of $549. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 980 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,753 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 224.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 980 includes 2,048 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,127 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,216 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 980 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 165 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 980 has the 127th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,604.5 score and $549 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 32.07. This is the 76th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q4 2018 | Q3 2014 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $549 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Just Cause 4
Darksiders III
Battlefield V
Hitman 2
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Forza Horizon 4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Just Cause 4 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 76 FPS | 109 FPS(+43.23%) |
| Medium - 1080p | 51 FPS | 77 FPS(+52.07%) |
| High - 1080p | 47 FPS | 67 FPS(+41.1%) |
| Ultra - 1080p | 44 FPS | 62 FPS(+40.77%) |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 44 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 24 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 20 orGeForce GTX 980
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 30.6 | +30% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 30 | +28% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 29.2 | +24% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 28.9 | +23% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 25.8 | +10% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 23.5 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 22.1 | -6% |
| Radeon RX 570 | 21.4 | -9% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 21 | -11% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 19.9 | -15% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 20 orGeForce GTX 980
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 13.53 | -42% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 13.71 | -41% |
| Radeon VII | 15.3 | -35% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16.53 | -29% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 22.46 | -4% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 23.36 | |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 20
12,28912% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 98043% better
17,604.517% of 104,737
The GeForce GTX 980 has 43% better performance than the Radeon Pro Vega 20 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is ranked 158th with a score of 12,289, and the GeForce GTX 980 is ranked 127th with a score of 17,604.5.
Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro Vega 20
No data available
GeForce GTX 980
32.0720% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 980 has 49% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 980's 32.07 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 20 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 480 | 17,919 | +46% |
| Radeon RX 470 | 17,624.5 | +43% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 17,604.5 | +43% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 17,543 | +43% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 17,401 | +42% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 13,131.5 | +7% |
| GeForce GTX 980M | 12,517 | +2% |
| Radeon Pro Vega 20 | 12,289 | |
| GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 12,267.5 | -0% |
| Quadro P3000 | 12,105 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 20 orGeForce GTX 980
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 960 | 54.11 | +69% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 48.73 | +52% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 41.83 | +30% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | +13% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 35.53 | +11% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | -0% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | -8% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | -17% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -30% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 2,600.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2,794.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 62,318 | 85,374 (+37%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 9,043.5 | 12,938 (+43.06%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 11,934.5 | 14,169 (+18.72%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 129.5 (+18.16%) | 109.6 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 5,300 | 11,098 (+109.4%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 562 | 798 (+41.99%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 129.7 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Vega 12 | GM204 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 5,200 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 189.4 Gb/s | 224.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 740 MHz | 1,753 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 1,024 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 W | 165 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 2x 6-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 1,280 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 2,048 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 20 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 80 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 64 |
| Core Clock Speed | 815 MHz | 1,127 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,283 MHz | 1,216 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 41.06 GPixel/s | 77.82 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 102.6 GTexel/s | 155.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 3.28 TFLOPS | 4.98 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 205.3 GFLOPS | 155.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.