AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

VS
Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 20265% better
12,28912% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 760M
3,3693% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 265% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro Vega 20
No data available
GeForce GTX 760M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro Vega 20 and the GeForce GTX 760M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro Vega 20
Shop GeForce GTX 760M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2018. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 12) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro Vega 20 has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 740 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 189.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro Vega 20 includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 815 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,283 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro Vega 20 has the 159th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 760M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 760M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 628 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 719 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 760M has the 286th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 5.0Kepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2018Q2 2013
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Just Cause 4
Just Cause 4
Display FPS for Darksiders III
Darksiders III
Display FPS for Battlefield V
Battlefield V
Display FPS for Hitman 2
Hitman 2
Display FPS for Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Just Cause 4
Just Cause 4
Radeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
Low - 720p
76 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
51 FPS
--
High - 1080p
47 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
44 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 20 orGeForce GTX 760M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 20 orGeForce GTX 760M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 20265% better
12,28912% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 760M
3,3693% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 265% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is ranked 159th with a score of 12,289, and the GeForce GTX 760M is ranked 286th with a score of 3,369.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro Vega 20
No data available
GeForce GTX 760M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro Vega 20 and the GeForce GTX 760M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 20 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 980M12,517+2%
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile12,340+0%
Radeon Pro Vega 2012,289
Quadro P300012,105-1%
Arc A370M12,089.5-2%
Quadro K3100M3,581-71%
Quadro K4000M3,466-72%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369-73%
GeForce MX2303,363.5-73%
Radeon R9 M3753,314-73%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 20 orGeForce GTX 760M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,600.5
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,794.5
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
62,318
(+291.94%)
15,900
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
9,043.5
(+298.22%)
2,271
3DMark 11 Performance Score
11,934.5
(+235.8%)
3,554
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
129.5
(+58.12%)
81.9
PassMark G3D Mark
5,300
(+208.14%)
1,720
PassMark G2D Mark
559
(+143.04%)
230
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
32.8
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
CodenameVega 12GK106S
ArchitectureGCN 5.0Kepler
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--2,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeHBM2GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth189.4 Gb/s64.13 Gb/s
Memory Clock740 MHz1,002 MHz
Memory Interface1,024 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)100 W55 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
Stream Processors (SP)1,280--
CUDA Cores--768
Compute Units (CU)20--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--4
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8064
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed815 MHz628 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,283 MHz719 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
Pixel Fill Rate41.06 GPixel/s11.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate102.6 GTexel/s46.02 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance3.28 TFLOPS1,104 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance205.3 GFLOPS46.02 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 760M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.06.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.