AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

VS
Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 1622% better
10,56910% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 22% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro Vega 16
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro Vega 16 and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro Vega 16
Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2018. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 12) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro Vega 16 has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 307.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro Vega 16 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 815 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,190 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro Vega 16 has the 174th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 5.0GCN 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2018Q2 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Radeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Low - 720p
65 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
51 FPS
--
High - 1080p
44 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 16 orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 16 orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 1622% better
10,56910% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 22% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is ranked 174th with a score of 10,569, and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro Vega 16
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro Vega 16 and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 16 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+2%
Arc A350M10,730+2%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569
T600 Mobile10,498-1%
Radeon 680M10,371-2%
Radeon R9 M295X8,850.5-16%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q8,752-17%
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)8,656-18%
GeForce GTX 880M8,578-19%
Radeon RX 560 Mobile8,329-21%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro Vega 16 orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,198
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,443
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
56,273
(+46.2%)
38,490
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7,745
(+13.58%)
6,819
3DMark 11 Performance Score
10,926
(+31.56%)
8,305
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
130.2
--
PassMark G3D Mark
4,809
4,911
(+2.12%)
PassMark G2D Mark
580
719
(+23.97%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
CodenameVega 12Amethyst
ArchitectureGCN 5.0GCN 3.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeHBM2GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth307.2 Gb/s174.7 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,200 MHz1,365 MHz
Memory Interface1,024 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache1,024 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W250 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Stream Processors (SP)1,0241,792
Compute Units (CU)1628
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)64112
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Core Clock Speed815 MHz834 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,190 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Pixel Fill Rate38.08 GPixel/s26.69 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate76.16 GTexel/s93.41 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.44 TFLOPS2.99 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance152.3 GFLOPS373.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.06.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.