AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

VS
Performance
Radeon Pro 560X69% better
7,5907% of 104,598
GeForce MX150
4,4944% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560X has 69% better performance than the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 560X
No data available
GeForce MX150
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 560X and the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro 560X
Shop GeForce MX150
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro 560X GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q3 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 560X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,470 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 94.08 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 560X includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,004 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 560X has the 213th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX150 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX150 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX150 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,469 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,532 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX150 has the 262nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Pascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2018Q2 2017
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Display FPS for Ghostwire: Tokyo
Ghostwire: Tokyo
Display FPS for ELEX 2
ELEX 2
Display FPS for Elden Ring
Elden Ring

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
Radeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
Low - 1080p
--
--
Medium - 1080p
--
15 FPS
High - 1080p
--
9 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
7 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560X orGeForce MX150
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile38.2+474%
GeForce MX1506.66

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560X orGeForce MX150
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro 560X69% better
7,5907% of 104,598
GeForce MX150
4,4944% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560X has 69% better performance than the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro 560X is ranked 213th with a score of 7,590, and the GeForce MX150 is ranked 262nd with a score of 4,494.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 560X
No data available
GeForce MX150
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 560X and the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560X or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 780M7,776.5+2%
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile7,678.5+1%
Radeon Pro 560X7,590
Quadro M22007,372-3%
GeForce GTX 965M7,322-4%
Radeon RX 550 Mobile4,559-40%
Radeon Pro 4504,502-41%
GeForce MX1504,494-41%
GeForce GTX 850M4,385.5-42%
GeForce GTX 950M4,367-42%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560X orGeForce MX150
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,614
(+54.3%)
1,046
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,775
(+56.73%)
1,132.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
32,449
(+69.61%)
19,132
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,699
(+63.39%)
3,488
3DMark 11 Performance Score
7,910
(+72.86%)
4,576
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
98.4
(+4.57%)
94.1
PassMark G3D Mark
3,678
(+61.81%)
2,273
PassMark G2D Mark
722
(+234.26%)
216
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
41.8
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
CodenamePolaris 21GP108
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Pascal
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors3,000 million1,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth94.08 Gb/s48.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,470 MHz1,502 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB48 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W25 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
Stream Processors (SP)1,024--
CUDA Cores--384
Compute Units (CU)16--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--3
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6424
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,004 MHz1,469 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,532 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
Pixel Fill Rate16.06 GPixel/s24.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate64.26 GTexel/s36.77 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.06 TFLOPS1,177 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance128.5 GFLOPS36.77 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro 560XGeForce MX150
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.